TOP NAV
BOOK
BLOGS 12
BLOGS 11
BLOGS 10
BLOGS 09
BLOGS 08
BLOGS 07
BLOGS 06
BLOGS 05
BLOGS 04
| Understanding the Left | Mendacity, the Mark of Decline |
by Christopher Chantrill
October 05, 2007 at 9:11 am
THE FUSS over Rush Limbaugh and the phoney soldiers (is it phoney or phony?) flap is all about patriotism and the questioning thereof. Jonah Goldberg gets deep into the subject.
[L]iberals routinely and righteously condemn the questioning of anyones patriotism until they have a chance to do it themselves. For example, in the debates over the formation of the Department of Homeland Security and the passage of Patriot Act, Democrats accused George Bush and the GOP leadership of questioning Democrats patriotism.
Or John Kerry before the Council on Foreign Relations:
I know what the Bush apologists will say to this that it is unpatriotic to question, to criticize and to call for change.
You are not allowed to call Democrats unpatriotic, and generally speaking, Republicans dont. They merely hint at it. But the rules dont apply to Democrats. Writes Goldberg:
Sen. Bob Graham called Bushs war policy anti-patriotic at the core. Kerry dubbed Bushs creed of greed you guessed it unpatriotic.
John Kerry? Calling someone else unpatriotic? Sure, and hes not the only one.
And now with Rush Limbaugh, Democrats, starting with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, are lining up to call the radio host unpatriotic and do whatever they can to discredit him.
The truth is, of course, that Democrats are caught in a bind here. For decades they have been mocking the idea of patriotism and nationalism. They have been urging us to move on beyond the primitive nation state to a global world order. They are all in favor of things like the United Nations and the European Union.
Their adepts, the left-wing netroots, are fully invested in the idea. They went to college and listened to their liberal college professors and they agree with their teachers. Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel. They dont understand why the Democrats dont stand up for their principles.
The reason, dear netroots, is that they cant. The overwhelming majority of Americans are patriotic and they believe in the nation state. Democrats can tell each other in the faculty lounge that patriotism is a form of bigotry. They can even say it in liberal precincts like San Francisco and Seattle. But they cant say that on the campaign trail if they want to be elected to state-wide or national office. You just cant get elected to national political office in America by trashing America.
In fact, the Democrats tried it once, in the aftermath of the Vietnam War. It didnt work too well. President Ronald Reagan was the result.
Since then Democrats have twisted themselves in knots with Pretzel Patriotism. They demand that nobody questions their patriotism. Thats because they cant afford to let that happen. They have to come up with weasel notions like Howard Zinns: Dissent is the highest form of patriotism.
But when it comes to patriotic Americans like Rush Limbaugh, hey, its Katie bar the door. Take anything he says out of context and blast him for assaulting the patriotism of the anti-war crowd.
But wait a minute. I thought the Peace people had got beyond primitive notions like the nation state.
Sphere: Related Content |Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com. His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.
[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists, she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican
Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism
For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008
Imagining that all order is the result of design, socialists
conclude that order must be improvable by better design of some superior mind.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit
[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values
But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family.
Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit
[T]he way to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,
Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop
discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District
A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is merely relative, is asking you not to believe him. So dont.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy
Paul Dirac: When I was talking with Lemaître about [the expanding universe] and feeling stimulated
by the grandeur of the picture that he has given us, I told him that
I thought cosmology was the branch of science that lies closest to religion.
However [Georges] Lemaître [Catholic priest, physicist, and
inventor of the Big Bang Theory] did not agree with me. After thinking it over he
suggested psychology as lying closest to religion.
John Farrell, The Creation Myth
Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization
No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome: if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent: if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe. They all require their strong wine diluted by a very large admixture of insipid common sense.
Lord Salisbury, Letter to Lord Lytton
In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society
mysql close 0
©2007 Christopher Chantrill