home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Thursday May 24, 2012 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 12

May 2012

Apr 2012

Mar 2012

Feb 2012

Jan 2012

BLOGS 11

Dec 2011

Nov 2011

Oct 2011

Sep 2011

Aug 2011

Jul 2011

Jun 2011

May 2011

Apr 2011

Mar 2011

Feb 2011

Jan 2011

BLOGS 10

Dec 2010

Nov 2010

Oct 2010

Sep 2010

Aug 2010

Jul 2010

Jun 2010

May 2010

Apr 2010

Mar 2010

Feb 2010

Jan 2010

BLOGS 09

Dec 2009

Nov 2009

Oct 2009

Sep 2009

Aug 2009

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

Free the Subprime Six! The Age of Anti-Heroes and Anti-Modesty

print view

The GOP Energy Raid

by Christopher Chantrill
June 19, 2008 at 4:46 pm

FOR YEARS the liberals have been telling us that we needed to end our addiction to oil. We needed to do this because energy use harmed the environment. It paved over the nation. It released greenhouse gases. Anyway, there was a finite supply of fossil fuels, and pretty soon we would hit the “peak oil” moment and oil production would go into irreversible decline. And we needed a national energy plan to prepare for a future of solar power, wind power, bio-fuels, and renewables.

All along, conservatives have been saying that liberals had it all wrong. Energy wasn’t a question of fixed or finite anything, it was an expression of human ingenuity. We could keep using oil—or maybe tar sands or oil shale—for centuries into the future. Or we could build nuclear plants. Or we could develop coal. Sure, we said, the planet is heating up—for now—but we don’t know enough about the future to start making wrenching changes in energy use.

By and large the American people have been going along with the liberals on this, and it is not hard to see why. If you get your information from the TV news or from newspapers and magazines they all agree with the liberal line.

Even as recently as last weekend, Sen. Barack Obama the uniter was peddling the liberal line, saying:

We can’t drill our way out of the problem.

You see, even if we did drill, it wouldn’t make much difference, and then we have to ask ourselves “if is worth it for us to damage the environment permanently” and so on.

Of course, this sort of black-and-white thinking is exactly what Democrats are always accusing the Republicans of doing.

But the problem is that energy and environmental policy involve predictions about the future. That means that they are uncertain. That means that they are almost certainly wrong. Suppose you develop an national energy plan. Suppose it was the most brilliant energy plan imaginable. One thing would be for sure. The day after it was announced, it would be out-of-date.

How do we deal with the future in society? We make bets on the future. Entrepreneurs and investors start new companies to develop new technology. Existing companies make decisions about whether to open a mine, or drill for oil, or build a power plant. Maybe they are right. Then they will make a lot of money. Maybe they are wrong. Then they will lose a lot of money. That is what the capitalist system is all about.

But conservatives don’t get a chance to talk to the American people about this until gas shoots up above $4.00 a gallon. Then all of a sudden when we say “Drill,” the American people agree with us and say “Yeah!”.

There is no use getting resentful about this. The fact is that liberals own the culture. They get to control pretty well what is said on the air and in print. But sometimes things go wrong. Sometimes they look like they don’t know what they are talking about, like right now when they seem to be expecting the working class and the poor to suck it in so liberals can feel good about saving the planet. That is the moment when conservatives can execute a daring raid into liberal territory shouting “Drill, Drill, Drill!”

And that is what President Bush did yesterday when he called for Congress to end the ban on drilling in Alaska and on the outer continental shelf.

So maybe we will be able to stampede the Democrats into letting the evil oil companies do what they want to do, the only thing they know how to do: Drill. For. Oil.

Then we can go back to global warming, polar bear extinction, and solar and wind power, and all the other silly stuff that liberals go on about all the time.

I tell you. This ain’t rocket science.

Sphere: Related Content |

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.


 TAGS


What Liberals Think About Conservatives

[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008


Socialism equals Animism

Imagining that all order is the result of design, socialists conclude that order must be improvable by better design of some superior mind.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Sacrifice

[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values


Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Racial Discrimination

[T]he way “to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,” Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300–301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District


Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy


Physics, Religion, and Psychology

Paul Dirac: “When I was talking with Lemaître about [the expanding universe] and feeling stimulated by the grandeur of the picture that he has given us, I told him that I thought cosmology was the branch of science that lies closest to religion. However [Georges] Lemaître [Catholic priest, physicist, and inventor of the Big Bang Theory] did not agree with me. After thinking it over he suggested psychology as lying closest to religion.”
John Farrell, “The Creation Myth”


Pentecostalism

Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization


Never Trust Experts

No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome: if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent: if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe. They all require their strong wine diluted by a very large admixture of insipid common sense.
Lord Salisbury, “Letter to Lord Lytton”


Mutual Aid

In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society


mysql close 0

 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill