TOP NAV
BOOK
BLOGS 12
BLOGS 11
BLOGS 10
BLOGS 09
BLOGS 08
BLOGS 07
BLOGS 06
BLOGS 05
BLOGS 04
| Free the Subprime Six! | The Age of Anti-Heroes and Anti-Modesty |
by Christopher Chantrill
June 19, 2008 at 4:46 pm
FOR YEARS the liberals have been telling us that we needed to end our addiction to oil. We needed to do this because energy use harmed the environment. It paved over the nation. It released greenhouse gases. Anyway, there was a finite supply of fossil fuels, and pretty soon we would hit the peak oil moment and oil production would go into irreversible decline. And we needed a national energy plan to prepare for a future of solar power, wind power, bio-fuels, and renewables.
All along, conservatives have been saying that liberals had it all wrong. Energy wasnt a question of fixed or finite anything, it was an expression of human ingenuity. We could keep using oilor maybe tar sands or oil shalefor centuries into the future. Or we could build nuclear plants. Or we could develop coal. Sure, we said, the planet is heating upfor nowbut we dont know enough about the future to start making wrenching changes in energy use.
By and large the American people have been going along with the liberals on this, and it is not hard to see why. If you get your information from the TV news or from newspapers and magazines they all agree with the liberal line.
Even as recently as last weekend, Sen. Barack Obama the uniter was peddling the liberal line, saying:
We cant drill our way out of the problem.
You see, even if we did drill, it wouldnt make much difference, and then we have to ask ourselves if is worth it for us to damage the environment permanently and so on.
Of course, this sort of black-and-white thinking is exactly what Democrats are always accusing the Republicans of doing.
But the problem is that energy and environmental policy involve predictions about the future. That means that they are uncertain. That means that they are almost certainly wrong. Suppose you develop an national energy plan. Suppose it was the most brilliant energy plan imaginable. One thing would be for sure. The day after it was announced, it would be out-of-date.
How do we deal with the future in society? We make bets on the future. Entrepreneurs and investors start new companies to develop new technology. Existing companies make decisions about whether to open a mine, or drill for oil, or build a power plant. Maybe they are right. Then they will make a lot of money. Maybe they are wrong. Then they will lose a lot of money. That is what the capitalist system is all about.
But conservatives dont get a chance to talk to the American people about this until gas shoots up above $4.00 a gallon. Then all of a sudden when we say Drill, the American people agree with us and say Yeah!.
There is no use getting resentful about this. The fact is that liberals own the culture. They get to control pretty well what is said on the air and in print. But sometimes things go wrong. Sometimes they look like they dont know what they are talking about, like right now when they seem to be expecting the working class and the poor to suck it in so liberals can feel good about saving the planet. That is the moment when conservatives can execute a daring raid into liberal territory shouting Drill, Drill, Drill!
And that is what President Bush did yesterday when he called for Congress to end the ban on drilling in Alaska and on the outer continental shelf.
So maybe we will be able to stampede the Democrats into letting the evil oil companies do what they want to do, the only thing they know how to do: Drill. For. Oil.
Then we can go back to global warming, polar bear extinction, and solar and wind power, and all the other silly stuff that liberals go on about all the time.
I tell you. This aint rocket science.
Sphere: Related Content |Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com. His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.
[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists, she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican
Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism
For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008
Imagining that all order is the result of design, socialists
conclude that order must be improvable by better design of some superior mind.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit
[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values
But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family.
Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit
[T]he way to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,
Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop
discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District
A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is merely relative, is asking you not to believe him. So dont.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy
Paul Dirac: When I was talking with Lemaître about [the expanding universe] and feeling stimulated
by the grandeur of the picture that he has given us, I told him that
I thought cosmology was the branch of science that lies closest to religion.
However [Georges] Lemaître [Catholic priest, physicist, and
inventor of the Big Bang Theory] did not agree with me. After thinking it over he
suggested psychology as lying closest to religion.
John Farrell, The Creation Myth
Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization
No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome: if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent: if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe. They all require their strong wine diluted by a very large admixture of insipid common sense.
Lord Salisbury, Letter to Lord Lytton
In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society
mysql close 0
©2007 Christopher Chantrill