home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Thursday May 24, 2012 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 12

May 2012

Apr 2012

Mar 2012

Feb 2012

Jan 2012

BLOGS 11

Dec 2011

Nov 2011

Oct 2011

Sep 2011

Aug 2011

Jul 2011

Jun 2011

May 2011

Apr 2011

Mar 2011

Feb 2011

Jan 2011

BLOGS 10

Dec 2010

Nov 2010

Oct 2010

Sep 2010

Aug 2010

Jul 2010

Jun 2010

May 2010

Apr 2010

Mar 2010

Feb 2010

Jan 2010

BLOGS 09

Dec 2009

Nov 2009

Oct 2009

Sep 2009

Aug 2009

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

What Ails Education? Beware the Hip Urbanites, Mr. Obama

print view

L'Esprit d'Escalier at KPLU

by Christopher Chantrill
July 30, 2008 at 11:16 am

LAST NIGHT I went into the belly of the beast to the taping of a roundtable at the local NPR affiliate KPLU. I and five others listened to audio clips of presidents past, present and future talking about Social Security and welfare—safety nets—and then talked about our feelings to KPLU reporter Paula Wissel.

After an experience like that you always think of the zingers you could have delivered, but didn’t. The French have a word for it: l’esprit d’escalier, the spirit of the stairs.

No problem here though. We eevil conservative Republicans now have our blogs. So we get the last word.

For a conservative, the problem with the whole set-up is that it presumes, almost at an instinctive level, that the Democratic way of social safety nets is the only one thinkable.

You know how it works. It start with a pressing social problem. Concerned activists raise consciousness. Experts devise solutions. Politicians step in with a government program. Everyone cheers and the bureaucrats go to work--for ever.

But the conservative understanding of social safety nets is that, unless you base the safety net on the “mediating structures” of family, church, neighborhood, and private association, you are going to fray the social fabric and eventually break the safety net. Governments don’t do safety nets. They do wars and rumors of wars.

That is what we have seen in the seventy years since Social Security was passed. And it is women and children that get hurt the most.

As we pointed out yesterday, the biggest problem the United States faces is that in the last generation the percentage of children being raised by a single parent has gone up. Among college graduates, it has doubled from five percent to ten percent. But among parents with less than a high-school education it has nearly quadrupled, from around twelve percent to 40 percent, before declining, since welfare reform, into the high 30s.

Children being raised by a single parent are much more likely to live in poverty.

Children being raised by a single parent are much more lilkely to suffer abuse—up to 35 times more than a child living with married biological mother and father.

Children being raised by a single parent probably don’t have a father in the house. The presence of a father means, for boys, that they act out less, and for girls, that they have fewer emotional problems.

The way to avoid all these problems is to anchor people in the mediating structures, discussed by Peter Berger and Richard Neuhaus in To Empower People. But that would mean backing out of the government progams and reempowering the mediating structures between individuals and the megastructures of big government, big coporations, and big unions.

Don’t look for our liberal friends at NPR to be talking about that sort of thing any time soon.

And it’s not because they are deliberately avoiding a national conversation about the social safety net. They probably never heard of Berger and Neuhaus, or read Michael Novak’s Spirit of Democratic Capitalism. They probably don’t get the import of Hayek’s dictum that government just doesn’t have the bandwidth to do the things it tries to do and consistently does so badly. And why should they? What would be the point?

Reporter Paula Wissel did a fine job moderating the roundtable. Until it came to the very end. Everyone on the panel openly and freely admitted who they were going to vote for. But not Paula Wissel (who looks a bit like a younger and more intelligent Helen Thomas). Said she: Oh no, I can’t tell you that. Mumble, mumble, “objective journalist.”

Oh please!

Still, it’s salutary to be in the room when an MSM journalist actually utters that canard. The thing is: she isn’t fooling anyone. She is so obviously a second-wave feminist with a standard second-wave feminist political philosophy that it would clear the air for her to be honest and up front. As in, hey, I’m a dyed-in-the-wool liberal, and proud of it. Probably never voted for a Republican in my life.

You could respect someone like that.

The roundtable I attended is one of a series that KPLU is putting together for broadcast every Tuesday between Labor Day and the November election as “Looking Backward to Look Forward.” Florangela Davila, lately of the Seattle Times, is the project manager doing the heavy lifting to make the program series happen. News Director at KPLU is Erin Hennessey.

Sphere: Related Content |

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.


 TAGS


What Liberals Think About Conservatives

[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008


Socialism equals Animism

Imagining that all order is the result of design, socialists conclude that order must be improvable by better design of some superior mind.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Sacrifice

[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values


Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Racial Discrimination

[T]he way “to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,” Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300–301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District


Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy


Physics, Religion, and Psychology

Paul Dirac: “When I was talking with Lemaître about [the expanding universe] and feeling stimulated by the grandeur of the picture that he has given us, I told him that I thought cosmology was the branch of science that lies closest to religion. However [Georges] Lemaître [Catholic priest, physicist, and inventor of the Big Bang Theory] did not agree with me. After thinking it over he suggested psychology as lying closest to religion.”
John Farrell, “The Creation Myth”


Pentecostalism

Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization


Never Trust Experts

No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome: if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent: if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe. They all require their strong wine diluted by a very large admixture of insipid common sense.
Lord Salisbury, “Letter to Lord Lytton”


Mutual Aid

In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society


mysql close 0

 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill