home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Friday September 3, 2010 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

ROAD TO THE

MIDDLE CLASS

Contents

Chapter 1

Chapter 2

Chapter 3

Chapter 4

Chapter 5

Chapter 6

Chapter 7

Chapter 8

Chapter 9

Chapter 10

Chapter 11

Chapter 12

Chapter 13

Chapter 14

Chapter 15

Bibliography

Chapter 10:
Explaining the Culture War

| <<prev | 1 | (2) | 3 | 4 | 5 | next>> |print view

Other thinkers have avoided the temptations of a myth that focused on the author’s world and have developed analytical frameworks to explain the diversity of human consciousness and understanding about the world rather than explain it away.  Perhaps the best known are the child development theories of Jean Piaget, the needs hierarchy of Abraham Maslow, and the human life cycle of Erik Erikson.  Other contributions include the moral development theory of Lawrence Kohlberg and the ego development stages of Jane Loevinger.  All these theories propose that humans are born with a limited consciousness and then through childhood and on into adulthood extend and develop step-by-step their understanding of the world and themselves.  All of the investigators agree, approximately, that each step, or stage in this process forms a base, a stepping off place for development into the next stage.

The first developmental psychologist was not Jean Piaget, but an American, James Mark Baldwin, born in 1861.  Educated at Princeton and at several German universities, he held professorships at Toronto, Princeton, Johns Hopkins University, and the National University of Mexico.  He projected five hierarchical levels of consciousness, starting with the Pre-logical, in which:

Presentation and its reality [are] not distinguished.  [There is] only an incipient perception of persons as different from things.

In the next level, the Quasi-logical, the person learns to differentiate between the inner and outer worlds and becomes aware of feelings shared by others.  Further up, in the Logical level, the person learns to differentiate truth and falsity, dealing critically with ideas and realities.  But the logical life is not the highest, for beyond is the Extra-logical level in which the person learns to judge good and bad and experience “development of the ideal aspect of experience in practical reason.” Hyper-logical is the highest level:

The self reads itself into experience, interpreting the generality of cognition through the singularity of sentiment.  The immediacy of feeling is restored, and the personal and concrete enter back into the scientific and theoretical, so that experience attains an aesthetic unity and becomes complete in itself while the real undergoes an expansion beyond the logical or scientific.  There is a complete reconciliation of the dichotomies: actual/ideal, knowledge/value, objectivity/intimacy, and producer/spectator. (Broughton 1982)

Notice how Baldwin has established that in this level the storms of Romanticism and the rebellion of bohemianism are solved in the reconciliation of dichotomies, expanding understanding beyond the logical or scientific rather than negating them.

It was from this beginning that Piaget developed his hierarchical system for explaining child cognitive development.  Beginning with sensorimotor (birth to 2 years) in which the child is developing its sensorimotor functions, the ability to interact with the environment and learn to move, he added preoperational, (2 years to 7 years) learning language and the ability to analyze limited, static information, concrete operational, (7 years to 11 years) learning to analyze more complex situations, handle transformations, and formal operational, (11 years and above) beginning to develop the ability to imagine the possibilities in a situation.

In Maslow’s related system, consciousness is expressed as a response to a hierarchy of needs.  First, a person must first satisfy her physiological needs: for food, water, rest, and sex.  Then she will be ready to deal with her safety needs: for security, comfort, and freedom from fear.  With safety needs taken care of, she will be able to deal with her belongingness needs, then self-esteem, then self-actualization, then self-transcendence. 

Arnold Mitchell developed and popularized Maslow’s needs hierarchy in The Nine American Lifestyles and the Values and Lifestyles program (VALS) at Stanford Research Institute.  People were defined by their lifestyles, “need-driven,” “outer-directed,” or “inner-directed.”  Writing in 1980, Mitchell found that about 11 percent of the population was need-driven, 67 percent outer-directed, and 20 percent inner-directed.  Another two percent were “Integrated.”  After the death of Mitchell, the VALS program was continued at SRI and modified into VALS2.  For VALS2 the old VALS lifestyles were juggled around and grouped by “Resources.”  The high resource group possessed “the full range of psychological, physical, demographic, and material means and capacities that people have to draw upon.”  Lifestyles included Actualizers in the high resource group, Strugglers in the low-resource group, and Fulfilleds, Believers, Achievers, Strivers, Experiencers, Makers in the medium resource group.

Lawrence Kohlberg developed a stage theory of moral development that tracks with Piaget’s theory of cognitive development.  The first stage is the preconventional.  The child does the right thing to avoid punishment, but is unable to consider the interests of others.  The second stage is conventional, living up to what other people expect of people in a specific role of son, sister, or friend.  People have an understanding that other peoples’ expectations take primacy over individual interests.  The third stage is post-conventional, or principled.  People understand that most values and rules are relative to a particular group; they learn to follow self-chosen ethical principles.

Jane Loevinger developed an ego stage theory in Ego Development.  It begins at birth with the Presocial stage, where the person lacks an ego, but learns to differentiate himself from the world and realize that there is a stable world of objects.  In the Symbiotic stage the baby learns to differentiate itself from mother, and by learning language to further differentiate itself as a separate person.  In the Impulsive stage, differentiation proceeds still further, with the beginnings of moral judgment, where “good” primarily means “good-to-me” and “bad” means “bad-to-me.”  The Self-protective stage is the first step towards control of impulses where the child learns to anticipate short-term rewards and punishments and understand the concept of rules.  But the main rule is “don’t get caught.” 

In the Conformist stage, the child begins to identify its own welfare with the welfare of the group, the family, or the peer group.  For this stage to be successful, the child must develop a sense of trust.  The Conformist values niceness and cooperation with others but sees behavior in terms of externals instead of internals, doing the right thing rather than feeling the right thing.  Belonging makes the Conformist feel secure.

The Self-aware level is the transition from Conformist to Conscientious and, according to Loevinger, “probably the modal level for adults in our society.”  Whereas the Conformist lives in a simple world in which the same thing is right always and for everyone, the Self-aware person sees alternatives, but still in stereotypic “categories like age, sex, marital status, and race, rather than in terms of individual differences in traits and needs.” 

At the Conscientious stage, the internalization of rules is completed.  The Conscientious person evaluates and chooses rules for himself, yet feels himself his brother’s keeper.  He aspires to achievement, but in his own terms.  There is a deepening understanding of other peoples’ viewpoints.


| <<prev | 1 | (2) | 3 | 4 | 5 | next>> |print view

 

Click for Chapter 11: A Likely Story

 

Your comments are welcome. Please e-mail to Christopher Chantrill at mailto:chrischantrill@gmail.com, and take the RMC test here.

©2005 Christopher Chantrill

 TAGS


What Liberals Think About Conservatives

[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican


Racial Discrimination

[T]he way “to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,” Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300–301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District


Liberal Coercion

[T]he Liberal, and still more the subspecies Radical... more than any other in these latter days seems under the impression that so long as he has a good end in view he is warranted in exercising over men all the coercion he is able[.]
Herbert Spencer, The Man Versus the State


Churches

[In the] higher Christian churches… they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm


Sacrifice

[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values


Pentecostalism

Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization


Conservatism's Holy Grail

What distinguishes true Conservatism from the rest, and from the Blair project, is the belief in more personal freedom and more market freedom, along with less state intervention... The true Third Way is the Holy Grail of Tory politics today - compassion and community without compulsion.
Minette Marrin, The Daily Telegraph


Moral Imperatives of Modern Culture

These emerge out of long-standing moral notions of freedom, benevolence, and the affirmation of ordinary life... I have been sketching a schematic map... [of] the moral sources [of these notions]... the original theistic grounding for these standards... a naturalism of disengaged reason, which in our day takes scientistic forms, and a third family of views which finds its sources in Romantic expressivism, or in one of the modernist successor visions.
Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self


Drang nach Osten

There was nothing new about the Frankish drive to the east... [let] us recall that the continuance of their rule depended upon regular, successful, predatory warfare.
Richard Fletcher, The Barbarian Conversion


Government Expenditure

The Union publishes an exact return of the amount of its taxes; I can get copies of the budgets of the four and twenty component states; but who can tell me what the citizens spend in the administration of county and township?
Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America


 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill