home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Friday May 25, 2012 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 12

May 2012

Apr 2012

Mar 2012

Feb 2012

Jan 2012

BLOGS 11

Dec 2011

Nov 2011

Oct 2011

Sep 2011

Aug 2011

Jul 2011

Jun 2011

May 2011

Apr 2011

Mar 2011

Feb 2011

Jan 2011

BLOGS 10

Dec 2010

Nov 2010

Oct 2010

Sep 2010

Aug 2010

Jul 2010

Jun 2010

May 2010

Apr 2010

Mar 2010

Feb 2010

Jan 2010

BLOGS 09

Dec 2009

Nov 2009

Oct 2009

Sep 2009

Aug 2009

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

Lee Harris: We Want More Middle Class Family Values

print view

Us Against the Gangs

by Christopher Chantrill
March 13, 2004 at 7:00 pm

|

THE GREAT PROBLEM of the Anglosphere is that its ideas are three hundred years old.  This means that the culture of democratic capitalism that dominates the world like a colossus is founded on ideas that groan with the load imposed upon them. 

For the young and the restless, three hundred year-old ideas aren’t good enough.  It is all very well for Russell Kirk to insist on the permanent things in The Conservative Mind, but what jewels does he offer to distract the young from the brilliant facets of Marx, Freud, and Foucault?  Nothing.

In fact, The Conservative Mind does not engage at all with the moderns.  It dismisses Rousseau, Hegel, Marx, and Freud as cranks and imposters.  And Kant doesn’t even rate a mention. 

This is madness.  Whatever their faults, the giants of the continental tradition spawned a vast intellectual tradition that nearly engulfed the Anglosphere.  It cannot be explained away or brushed off.  Where it is right, it should be improved.  Where it is wrong, it should be challenged. 

But things are changing.  After a century in which German psychology seemed to point like an arrow into the heart of middle-class culture, we now have the developmental psychology of Clare Graves and his disciples that confronts the continental psychology of Freud, Piaget, and Erikson and trumps it.  It shows that the rule-and-role culture of the middle class is not expendable or even replaceable, and that the lefty dream of creative universal community is doomed to failure unless it is founded on the middle-class virtues.

In the writings of English professor Frederick Turner we have a solution to the modernist and postmodern cultural death spiral.  His Culture of Hope and Shakespeare’s Twenty-first Century Economics inaugurate the beginnings of a new tradition that takes the culture of challenge and transcends it with a culture of exaltation.

In the writings of Ken Wilber we can see a revival of the effort—begun nearly two hundred years ago by Schopenhauer—to effect a meeting of east and west in philosophy and spiritual understanding and practice.

With Civilization and Its Enemies, Lee Harris begins another heroic effort.  He begins to take sociology back from the Marxists.  Using his knowledge of Hegel, he builds a new sociology of the west, demonstrating that its power derives from crucial developments in social organization. 

First of all he calls attention to the transformation of the teenage boys’ gang into the team.  It allowed the Greeks to scale back the power of the family and allow people to extend the bounds of trust beyond blood relationships.  The power of the team was first exhibited in the hoplite heavy infantry of the Spartans, then in the Roman concept of patria, and latterly in the invention of the nation state.  Today we see it manifest in the stunning power of modern corporations and the American army in the Middle East.

But there’s more.  Harris interprets the Protestant Reformation as the discovery of self-government by the burghers of North Germany.  The city economy demands more than grudging obedience to the law.  Its success demands self-control and the performance of promises from its merchants and artisans.  Thus was born the “respectable” businessman, modern professionalism and the Protestant conscience.  “It is an error to ask whether Protestantism caused capitalism, as Weber argued, or capitalism Protestantism, as Marx argued.”  The two go together, and reinforce each other.  And they have changed the world.

But our culture of self-government faces a problem.  What do we do about people who do not join the culture and obey the rules of the team and self-governing bourgeoisism?  What do we do, in fact, about “the eternal gang of ruthless men?”  “Someone must be prepared to fight them whenever they threaten to enter into history.”  Like Al Qaeda does right now.

The problem is, of course, to whom do we give the power to deal ruthlessly with the ruthless men?  And how do we prevent them from becoming a mirror of the gang of ruthless men we have mobilized them to defeat, new Napoleons interested only in their own glory.

The answer is, of course, Us.  The United States is uniquely qualified to gang up on the gangs because, beyond any society in the world, it has internalized the code of honor begun by the North German bourgeoisie of 1500.  It wants only to live in a world of commercial trust and reciprocity.

If only the intellectuals of America and Europe would grasp this, and stop following their bliss to “abstract utopias and fantasy ideologies and return to the real world.” 

Harris’s Civilization and Its Enemies contains three or four ideas of the first rank, and represents another building in the new city on a hill that we are building to transcend the utopian visions of the continentals.  One day this new construction will appear on the radar of the liberal intellectual establishment.  But then it will be too late.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


What Liberals Think About Conservatives

[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008


Socialism equals Animism

Imagining that all order is the result of design, socialists conclude that order must be improvable by better design of some superior mind.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Sacrifice

[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values


Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Racial Discrimination

[T]he way “to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,” Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300–301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District


Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy


Physics, Religion, and Psychology

Paul Dirac: “When I was talking with Lemaître about [the expanding universe] and feeling stimulated by the grandeur of the picture that he has given us, I told him that I thought cosmology was the branch of science that lies closest to religion. However [Georges] Lemaître [Catholic priest, physicist, and inventor of the Big Bang Theory] did not agree with me. After thinking it over he suggested psychology as lying closest to religion.”
John Farrell, “The Creation Myth”


Pentecostalism

Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization


Never Trust Experts

No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome: if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent: if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe. They all require their strong wine diluted by a very large admixture of insipid common sense.
Lord Salisbury, “Letter to Lord Lytton”


Mutual Aid

In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society


mysql close

 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill