A Case Of The Economic Shivers

THE FINANCIAL markets gave a convulsive shiver a month ago when the Fed raised its Fed Funds rate to 5 percent and allowed as how it might well pause in its monthly quarter-point increase action. Oh no you don’t, came the unmistakable response, as global stocks, the dollar, US government bonds, oil, and gold all tanked.

That means that the rosy scenario, in which the Fed would tighten up to the 5 percent level and then benevolently pause while the national economy continued to grow comfortably along at 3.5 to 4.0 percent per year is probably defunct. Interest rates are going on up, almost certainly to 6 percent or higher. It also means that the pips are going to start squeaking as people who have borrowed on low interest ARMs have to adjust as their adjustable rate mortgages adjust upwards.

British investment banker Sir Siegmund Warburg had another term for “rosy scenario.” According to Professor Niall Ferguson, he used to talk about “wishful non-thinking.” It’s a pity that Sir Siegmund’s chosen successor at SG Warburg, Sir David Scholey, didn’t listen to his mentor. He overextended Warburg during Fed Chairman Greenspan’s tightening in 1993 and had to sell the investment bank to Swiss Bank Corporation.

The problem is to find a balance between a healthy optimism and the “wishful non-thinking” that ignores the inevitability of a train wreck when an onrushing locomotive is already in sight thundering down the track.

Are we heading for a train wreck like 1980 when inflation, interest rates, and unemployment were all hitting 10 percent? Or is this 1990, when the S&L meltdown was, finally, handled by liquidating the malinvestments of S&L barons like Charles Keating to the tune of $500 billion or so in government bonds? Or will the US economy power ahead and continue to confound its critics?

The Federal Reserve Board has two jobs. One is fighting recession. That is the fun part of its job. The other job is fighting inflation. That is the unpleasant part of the job, the role of the kill-joy who snatches the punchbowl away just when the party is getting lively.

Right now, the Fed is in transition between its two jobs. It had a grand old time in the early Noughties, spiking the punchbowl with low interest rates until it got the Fed Funds rate down to 1.0 percent. What a party Americans had, refinancing their mortgages, buying and building mega-mansions and starter castles, boosting real-estate prices into the stratosphere on the high octane fuel of cheap credit. Now the Fed has its hands on the punchbowl and it is impatiently looking at its watch.

What will the Fed do? Will there be a dollar crisis? Will there be a housing crash? Will there be a nasty recession? Nobody knows. Right now people are placing their bets, and hoping that they are not indulging in “wishful non-thinking.”

Years ago, a wise old head wrote that the most important issue for the federal government is not fighting inflation, or growing the economy, or even saving Social Security. For the government, job one is to float its paper: its debt and its paper money. As long as the bond market is buying the government’s bonds, notes, and bills, and people are willing to hold its paper money then everything is fine. It is when the government loses the confidence of the bond market and cannot sell its paper or when people start pushing money around in wheel-barrows that people start to tremble.

Think Germany in 1923, Nationalist China in the late 1940s, Argentina in 2001, Zimbabwe in 2006. These are loser governments. In 1980, of course, at the height of the Carter inflation, there was a bobble or two of worry about the United States on the loser front.

On the other hand, the finest hour of government finance has to be the US government’s financing of World War II. The government cranked the deficit up to 40 percent of GDP; the Treasury floated an ocean of bonds; the Fed bought a lot of those bonds to keep interest rates down, and they barely broke a sweat.

Isn’t it interesting that President Bush has just nominated the king of Wall Street, Goldman Sachs boss Henry M. Paulson Jr., to be Secretary of the Treasury? Pretty soon he’ll be traveling the world humming Irving Berlin’s old song:

Any bonds today?
Bonds of freedom
That’s what I’m selling
Any bonds today?
Scrape up the most you can
Here comes the freedom man
Asking you to buy a share of freedom today

You can see where President Bush has placed his bet. But no “wishful non-thinking,” please, Mr. President.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com. His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

TAGS

Civil Society

“Civil Society”—a complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churches—builds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust

What Liberals Think About Conservatives

[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican

Liberal Coercion

[T]he Liberal, and still more the subspecies Radical... more than any other in these latter days seems under the impression that so long as he has a good end in view he is warranted in exercising over men all the coercion he is able[.]
Herbert Spencer, The Man Versus the State

Moral Imperatives of Modern Culture

These emerge out of long-standing moral notions of freedom, benevolence, and the affirmation of ordinary life... I have been sketching a schematic map... [of] the moral sources [of these notions]... the original theistic grounding for these standards... a naturalism of disengaged reason, which in our day takes scientistic forms, and a third family of views which finds its sources in Romantic expressivism, or in one of the modernist successor visions.
Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self

US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism

Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008

Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006

Never Trust Experts

No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome: if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent: if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe. They all require their strong wine diluted by a very large admixture of insipid common sense.
Lord Salisbury, “Letter to Lord Lytton”

Conservatism's Holy Grail

What distinguishes true Conservatism from the rest, and from the Blair project, is the belief in more personal freedom and more market freedom, along with less state intervention... The true Third Way is the Holy Grail of Tory politics today - compassion and community without compulsion.
Minette Marrin, The Daily Telegraph

Class War

In England there were always two sharply opposed middle classes, the academic middle class and the commercial middle class. In the nineteenth century, the academic middle class won the battle for power and status... Then came the triumph of Margaret Thatcher... The academics lost their power and prestige and... have been gloomy ever since.
Freeman Dyson, “The Scientist as Rebel”

Government Expenditure

The Union publishes an exact return of the amount of its taxes; I can get copies of the budgets of the four and twenty component states; but who can tell me what the citizens spend in the administration of county and township?
Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

Conservatism

Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity

mysql close