|India, China, and the Disciplinary Society||Conservative Off-site: Mission Statement|
by Christopher Chantrill
December 11, 2008 at 11:12 am
FOR THE next month our Democratic friends will be focusing on the inauguration of Barack Obama as President of the United States. Its a good opportunity for conservatives to have an off-site.
You all know what that is. You take off a day or two from work and go to a convention facility where, facilitated by an expensive consultant, you and your co-workers figure out what it is you are supposed to be doing.
I know. You are asking: Do we have to? Hey, its an opportunity to clear our minds and think Big Ideas.
The first thing to do at an off-site is to develop a Vision Statement. Thats a blue-sky definition of what your organization does, a statement of its values. It is not a nuts-and-bolts thing about what you are going to do next week. For instance, if President Reagan had ever gone on an off-site, he would probably have created a Vision Statement something like this:
I will lead America towards that shining city on a hill, because America is still a beacon, still a magnet for all who must have freedom whose best years are yet to come.
Good old Ronnie. There was a man who never needed to go on an off-site and figure out what life was all about.
But Ronald Reagan is gone now. It falls to us to devise a Vision Statement for a post-Reagan era. How hard can it be?
First of all, the Vision Statement must cover all the bases of Michael Novaks three sectors: economic, political, and cultural. This is just common sense. All Novak is saying with his three sectors is that our modern society is best understood as three centers of power, three ways in which we all interact with society.
(If you want to be sophisticated about it, you can rumble on about Eric Voegelins notion of the leap in being from compact to differentiated knowledge. Simple minds think in terms of society but we sophisticated conservatives have made the leap in being to a higher, nobler understanding of society where we differentiate society into three parts.)
In the economic sector, conservatives believe in the fundamental community of interests. We believe, unlike many others in our society, that Americans can offer their labor in the marketplace and themselves into marriage, and their children into the world, and trust that everything will turn out all right. But we dont want to talk merely about the free and competitive marketplace. Conservatism must not just appeal to men, who believe in competition, but belong also to women, who major in cooperation.
When it comes to the political sector, we believe in freedom. That means we believe in law, which is the sophisticated way of resolving conflict, and we believe in limited government, because you cannot have freedom unless you limit the powers of government. We do not, by the way, believe in pure or, as our lefty friends say, genuine democracy. Our US Constitution was designed as a blend of the democratic principle in the legislature, the monarchical principle in the presidency, and the aristocratic principle in the judiciary. And a good thing too.
When it comes to the moral/cultural sector, we conservatives believe in transcendence. We do not believe that the answer to life, the universe, and everything can be captured or achieved in this material, mortal life alone. We believe that meaning, as a fundamental mystery, must transcend mortal life. There is a word for this ultimate mystery. It is God.
I think we are ready to put our Vision Statement down on paper. Here it is:
We believe in an America that lives and works together, with limited government, under God.
Everything in this terse statement is pregnant with conservative meaning. When we talk about an America where we live and work together we are evoking the system of voluntary cooperation under law that we call capitalism. But we also include the girl side of voluntary cooperation, the community of women working and relating together, sharing and caring. The conservative economy is not just guys battling all the other guys for market share, but gals trying to make the whole world into a relationship.
When we talk about an America with limited government we are talking about an America where the government doesnt get its fingers into every pie as it does today. That would be an America that wasnt spending 20 percent of GDP on government pensions, government healthcare, government education, and government welfare.
When we talk about an America under God we are talking about an America where the dominant belief system is transcendent religion not secular religion.
But what do you think? What do you think our Vision Statement should be? Feel free to comment and help develop a vision for the future of conservatism.
Buy his Road to the Middle Class.
When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of agesthey seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings, and that a refusal to use the means appointed was a damning sin.
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990
In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society
We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.
E. G. West, Education and the State
Law being too tenuous to rely upon in [Ulster and the Scottish borderlands], people developed patterns of settling differences by personal fighting and family feuds.
Thomas Sowell, Conquests and Cultures
The primary thing to keep in mind about German and Russian thought since
1800 is that it takes for granted that the Cartesian, Lockean or Humean scientific and
philosophical conception of man and nature... has been shown by indisputable evidence to be
F.S.C. Northrop, The Meeting of East and West
Inquiry does not start unless there is a problem... It is the problem and its
characteristics revealed by analysis which guides one first to the relevant facts and then,
once the relevant facts are known, to the relevant hypotheses.
F.S.C. Northrop, The Logic of the Sciences and the Humanities
But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie
that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison
I mean three systems in one: a predominantly market economy; a polity respectful of the rights of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and a system of cultural institutions moved by ideals of liberty and justice for all.
In short, three dynamic and converging systems functioning as one: a democratic polity, an economy based on markets and incentives, and a moral-cultural system which is plural and, in the largest sense, liberal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism
The incentive that impels a man to act is always some uneasiness...
But to make a man act [he must have]
the expectation that purposeful behavior has the power to remove
or at least to alleviate the felt uneasiness.
Ludwig von Mises, Human Action
[In the] higher Christian churches... they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm
When we received Christ, Phil added, all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh
The recognition and integration of extralegal property rights [in the Homestead Act] was a key element in the United States becoming the most important market economy and producer of capital in the world.
Hernando de Soto, The Mystery of Capital