home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  Take the Test!
Friday July 3, 2009 
by Christopher Chantrill

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 09

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

Taking the Cultural Temperature Breaking Liberal Taboos on Education

print view

What the Bleep? It's a Movie!

by Christopher Chantrill
July 03, 2004 at 8:00 pm

|

EVER SINCE relativity and quantum mechanics were invented in the early twentieth century, people have wondered: What on earth does it all mean? Wonder no more. Now there’s a movie to explain it all to you: What the Bleep Do We Know?

That’s right. Now they’ve made a movie about the wonders of modern physics, recent discoveries in neuroscience, and the nagging questions they raise about reality, spirituality, and “the meaning of life, the universe, and everything.” A film by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, and Mark Vicente, What the Bleep is doing a good business in about 15 art houses on the left coast and Colorado. Maybe it will expand soon to a theater near you.

But how do you make a two-hour movie about quantum mechanics, neuroscience, reality, and the meaning of life without putting everyone to sleep?  You mix together a blend of talking heads, computer special effects, and throw a narrative about a talented, angry photographer, and hope that people will come.

This being the twenty-first century, the talented, angry photographer is the hearing-impaired Marlee Matlin, the star of Children of a Lesser God.  And the problem we are trying to solve is to help her become the outstanding person and creative artist she was always meant to be.  But first she’ll have to deal with her anger so she can throw away the anxiety pills.

If you think that this sounds like some dreadful liberal morality tale, where good and evil are tossed out as narrow-minded bigotry and then smuggled in the back door in the service of creativity and compassion, you’d be right.  But it still manages to be a good movie.  Its crew of colorful talking heads is first-rate; its computer animation of sub-atomic particles, cartoon human emotions, and neuro-peptides is passable.  And it has a Polish wedding that features a big argument about polkas.

As you may know, if you have ever watched a liberal morality tale, you cannot become the free, creative person you were meant to be unless you get rid of your demons, here represented as addictive emotions being pumped out of your hypothalamus as neuro-peptides.  How do you do that?  You realize that you not divided against yourself but really are already the One you were always meant to be. 

The one thing you must also transcend is the limiting notion of good and evil.  The God of good and evil is a blasphemy, says the talking head professor of theology, Dr. Miceal Ledwith.  The true god is creativity, all the talking heads agree.

This is a great movie for the creative classes, the elite readers of The New York Times, listeners to NPR, and secular liberals in general.  It fits into their belief systems like a peptide into a cell receptor.  No doubt that for a talented and skilled deaf photographer it’s true that all she needs to do to solve her problems is to lose the anger and learn to love her body.  But what about the rest of us?

For instance, what about the 400 million believing Pentecostals worldwide?  We are talking here about a religious movement that has gone from zero to 400 million in a hundred years.  What about the 70 million house church Christians in China?  We are talking here about a religious movement that has gone from zero to 70 million in about thirty years.

We are talking about 500 million people here in two spontaneous religious movements that have flourished in spite of, and sometimes in the teeth of persecution from the world’s elite creative classes.  In an age when the cultural elite has insisted that the only evils are racism, classism, sexism, and homophobia, they believe profoundly in good and evil, that Jesus Christ as a personal Savior, who died for our sins. 

Are these people all blasphemers, as Dr. Miceal Ledwith would have us believe?   Or is it possible that enthusiastic Christianity is a practical belief system that promises salvation for ordinary people just as the religion of creativity promises salvation to angry creative artists?

It’s something to think about, isn’t it?  Why is it that in spite of a century of public education and the withering testimony of German philology hundreds of millions of people still believe in a personal God and in Jesus Christ as their personal Savior?  For some reason they believe that the way out of addiction and anger is through the love of Jesus Christ and the forgiveness of sins.

What the Bleep is another social indicator that despite the efforts of the ACLU, the educated elite is edging back, if not to religion, at least to some form of “spirituality.” It would be nice if the elite weren’t so dogmatically determined to differentiate itself from the enthusiastic Christian “Other.”

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view


 

 TAGS


Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison


Hugo on Genius

“Tear down theory, poetic systems… No more rules, no more models… Genius conjures up rather than learns… ” —Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois


Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State


Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990


Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh


Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy


Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006


China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing


Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Conservatism

Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008


mysql close

 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill