home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Friday May 25, 2012 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 12

May 2012

Apr 2012

Mar 2012

Feb 2012

Jan 2012

BLOGS 11

Dec 2011

Nov 2011

Oct 2011

Sep 2011

Aug 2011

Jul 2011

Jun 2011

May 2011

Apr 2011

Mar 2011

Feb 2011

Jan 2011

BLOGS 10

Dec 2010

Nov 2010

Oct 2010

Sep 2010

Aug 2010

Jul 2010

Jun 2010

May 2010

Apr 2010

Mar 2010

Feb 2010

Jan 2010

BLOGS 09

Dec 2009

Nov 2009

Oct 2009

Sep 2009

Aug 2009

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

America's Emerging Liberal Oligarchy The Difference Between Change and Reform

print view

Pity a Poor Banker

by Christopher Chantrill
February 19, 2009 at 5:56 pm

|

LAST WEEK our noble solons lined up a bunch of bank CEOs and proceeded to lash themselves into a lather. All hands aft to witness punishment, as they say in naval fiction.

I’m sorry, Mr. Congressman. I don’t get it. I thought the whole point of government grants and bailouts and stimulus was to spray money around for people to spend. So what’s the problem if the bankers take you at your word?

Let’s get some clarity here. Banking is a government program, the means by which the government control the credit system. Bankers are the government’s toadies.

Mainly, governments like to control the credit system because they need money for wars. The banking granddaddy of them all, the Bank of England, got its start because the British government needed someone in 1692 to sell its bonds so it could fight a war. Thus was born the British National Debt. You’d expect ukpublicspending.co.uk to have a handy chart on this, and it does.

In the 18th century the British government used all that borrowed money to conquer the world. Then, in the long 19th century, they paid the National Debt back and built an industrial empire on the proceeds until it was time to Hang the Kaiser and defeat the Nazis.

By and large through all this the Bank of England did a pretty good job, at least until World War II.

In the United States the government has consistently screwed up the credit system, almost from the very beginning. Viewed in this light the Federal Reserve Board’s slam-bang on-off monetary policy of the last ten years is nothing new. The US government has never had a clue when it came to regulating credit conditions.

In its early years the US couldn’t decide whether it wanted a central bank. Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton pushed through the First Bank of the United States in 1791 and nationalized the debts of the revolutionary war, but Congress refused to renew the bank’s charter in 1811. With exquisite timing the United States found itself without a central bank to fight the War of 1812.

Still, the United States managed to pay off its National Debt by the 1840s as this chart from usgovernmentspending.com illustrates.

The Second Bank of the United States was chartered in 1815 but closed by President Andrew Jackson in 1837. Jackson also stopped a big land boom dead in its tracks with his Specie Circular of 1836. His action required that all payments for government land be made in gold or silver. The speculators ran for the hills in the Panic of 1837 and the money supply fell by about 35 percent. We are talking about a five-year depression.

Next up was the Civil War. It was financed in part by printing money and in part by hundred of millions of government bonds sold by Jay Cooke. But after the war the government turned to deflation to restore the value of the dollar. When it decided to demonetize silver it set off the Panic of 1873 and a sharp contraction in credit. The following years came to be called the Long Depression.

They were certainly deflationary. But with the passage of the Sherman Silver Purchase Act in 1890 the government swung back to an inflationary stance. The economy boomed for a while until people started trading in their silver certificates for gold. That set off the Panic of 1893.

Thank goodness the US had a banker like J. Pierpont Morgan who could bail out the US government in 1895 when it almost ran out of gold and halt the Panic of 1907 with a triage committee of the wealthiest men in New York City.

After Morgan saved the economy everyone agreed that the US needed a credit system without the taint of Morgan and his “money trust.” So we got the Federal Reserve and the Great Depression of the 1930s.

To heal the credit system in the 1930s the government had to devalue the dollar from $20.75 per ounce to $35. In the 1970s the government went off the gold exchange standard and floated the dollar eventually down to $800 per ounce in the nadir of the Carter malaise of 1979-80. In the early 1980s Ronald Reagan and Paul Volcker brought the dollar back, but new smash-ups from government credit wheezes like the Savings and Loan collapse of 1989 and the Fannie-Freddie meltdown of 2008 have reduced the credit system to a pulp. We don’t yet know what it will take to get the credit system off the rocks in 2009.

If you were a banker, what would you do right about now? Exactly. You’d pay yourself a big bonus and head for the hills.

Let’s have a witch-hunt and nationalize the banks. That’s the way to teach them a lesson.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


What Liberals Think About Conservatives

[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008


Socialism equals Animism

Imagining that all order is the result of design, socialists conclude that order must be improvable by better design of some superior mind.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Sacrifice

[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values


Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Racial Discrimination

[T]he way “to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,” Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300–301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District


Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy


Physics, Religion, and Psychology

Paul Dirac: “When I was talking with Lemaître about [the expanding universe] and feeling stimulated by the grandeur of the picture that he has given us, I told him that I thought cosmology was the branch of science that lies closest to religion. However [Georges] Lemaître [Catholic priest, physicist, and inventor of the Big Bang Theory] did not agree with me. After thinking it over he suggested psychology as lying closest to religion.”
John Farrell, “The Creation Myth”


Pentecostalism

Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization


Never Trust Experts

No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome: if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent: if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe. They all require their strong wine diluted by a very large admixture of insipid common sense.
Lord Salisbury, “Letter to Lord Lytton”


Mutual Aid

In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society


mysql close

 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill