home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Friday May 25, 2012 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 12

May 2012

Apr 2012

Mar 2012

Feb 2012

Jan 2012

BLOGS 11

Dec 2011

Nov 2011

Oct 2011

Sep 2011

Aug 2011

Jul 2011

Jun 2011

May 2011

Apr 2011

Mar 2011

Feb 2011

Jan 2011

BLOGS 10

Dec 2010

Nov 2010

Oct 2010

Sep 2010

Aug 2010

Jul 2010

Jun 2010

May 2010

Apr 2010

Mar 2010

Feb 2010

Jan 2010

BLOGS 09

Dec 2009

Nov 2009

Oct 2009

Sep 2009

Aug 2009

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

The Difference Between Them and Us Thatcher's Victory: Then and Now

print view

What Price Limited Government?

by Christopher Chantrill
May 02, 2009 at 2:52 pm

|

IF YOU ATTENDED a Tea Party recently you were sure to have heard speakers talk about “limited government” and “liberty.” But what does it mean? When does government cease to be limited?

We could look at the numbers. If you go to usgovernmentspending.com and its new home page, you could take a look at one of the pie charts that helpfully show the division of the economy between private and public sector. Right now, in 2009, we are looking at 45 percent of the economy run by the government, as the chart shows.

It’s a daunting number, but still, we still have our liberties, or, as our liberal friends say, our rights. But if you select the year 1909 in the convenient usgovernmentspending.com dropdown control you get this:

That is a horse of a different color. Imagine that! A government sector so small that you can’t even squeeze the label into the pie chart! The number, for those of you without fighter-pilot eyes, is 7.8 percent. To us, living in the era of big government and CNN reporterettes shilling for the liberals, it seems incomprehensible. How could America survive on such a small public sector?

No doubt the Americans of 1909 would ask a different question. How can America possibly thrive when it has to support such a large government sector?

The massive increases in government sector planned by the Obama administration are all part of a grand strategy, writes Charles Krauthammer this week.

In the service of his ultimate mission — the leveling of social inequalities — President Obama offers a tripartite social democratic agenda: nationalized health care, federalized education (ultimately guaranteed through college) and a cash-cow carbon tax (or its equivalent) to subsidize the other two.

It’s tempting to think of the Obamunists as fiendishly clever, executing on a grand plan to take over the world. But I don’t believe that politicians and their advisors think that way. The Obama agenda simply aggregates the demands of the various powerful interests in the Democratic Party.

Nationalized health care? Most Democrats simply believe in “health care” as a right; it’s one of the articles of the liberal faith.

Federalized education? Merely Democratic interests at work. The college professors want more money for colleges; the teachers want more money for schools; and the feminists want their pre-school children off their hands.

Carbon taxes? Every liberal believes that we are destroying the planet and that you and I must live simply so that others may simply live.

The problem is that each of these efforts reduce Americans more and more to the status of subjects. When the government runs health care the government will decide what health care you will get. The Obamanoids understand this, according to Krauthammer:

Why do you think the stimulus package pours $1.1 billion into medical "comparative effectiveness research"? It is the perfect setup for rationing. Once you establish what is "best practice" for expensive operations, medical tests and aggressive therapies, you’ve laid the premise for funding some and denying others.

And certainly the most obvious “best practice” is to deny funding for expensive procedures for the elderly who are going to die anyway. If there’s a grand strategy it is right there.

Grand strategy or not, the liberal giant will lumber along, burping up bossy new ideas to spend our money and control us, until we decide to stop it.

It can be done. You can see them doing it in Walter Isaacson’s Benjamin Franklin: An American Life.

Benjamin Franklin spent almost 20 years in Britain during the 1750s and 1760s trying to tell the Brits that Americans were getting more and more annoyed at their subject status. And the Brits, Lord This and Lord That, got angrier and angrier at the presumption of the colonials. Nobody in Britland had the least idea that the bloody colonials would rise up and rebel.

What Americans wanted in those days was the right to govern themselves. They couldn’t, because the bossy Brits knew better and wouldn’t let them.

Today we’re oppressed by bossy liberals who also deny us the right to govern ourselves and who have plans to boss us even more.

There is a simple answer to the bossiness of Brits and the bossiness of liberals. Limited Government. Here’s how it might look, one day, on usgovernmentspending.com:

That 25 percent in 2020 is not just hot air. When asked, Americans tell pollsters that their taxes shouldn’t exceed 25 percent of income.

Do you think that we have the cojones to insist upon it?

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990


Mutual Aid

In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society


Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State


Living Under Law

Law being too tenuous to rely upon in [Ulster and the Scottish borderlands], people developed patterns of settling differences by personal fighting and family feuds.
Thomas Sowell, Conquests and Cultures


German Philosophy

The primary thing to keep in mind about German and Russian thought since 1800 is that it takes for granted that the Cartesian, Lockean or Humean scientific and philosophical conception of man and nature... has been shown by indisputable evidence to be inadequate. 
F.S.C. Northrop, The Meeting of East and West


Knowledge

Inquiry does not start unless there is a problem... It is the problem and its characteristics revealed by analysis which guides one first to the relevant facts and then, once the relevant facts are known, to the relevant hypotheses.
F.S.C. Northrop, The Logic of the Sciences and the Humanities


Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison


Democratic Capitalism

I mean three systems in one: a predominantly market economy; a polity respectful of the rights of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and a system of cultural institutions moved by ideals of liberty and justice for all. In short, three dynamic and converging systems functioning as one: a democratic polity, an economy based on markets and incentives, and a moral-cultural system which is plural and, in the largest sense, liberal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Action

The incentive that impels a man to act is always some uneasiness... But to make a man act [he must have] the expectation that purposeful behavior has the power to remove or at least to alleviate the felt uneasiness.
Ludwig von Mises, Human Action


Churches

[In the] higher Christian churches… they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm


Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh


Living Law

The recognition and integration of extralegal property rights [in the Homestead Act] was a key element in the United States becoming the most important market economy and producer of capital in the world.
Hernando de Soto, The Mystery of Capital


mysql close

 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill