TOP NAV
BOOK
BLOGS 12
BLOGS 11
BLOGS 10
BLOGS 09
BLOGS 08
BLOGS 07
BLOGS 06
BLOGS 05
BLOGS 04
| Giving Thanks for Obama | Warren Buffett, Robber Baron |
by Christopher Chantrill
December 09, 2010 at 11:11 am
ALL OF A sudden, liberal pundits are getting worked up about the influence of Wall Street. From the concern expressed one would think that the contributions from Goldman Sachs have suddenly dried up now that the Republicans have taken over the House of Representatives. Heres William D. Cohan in The New York Times worrying about The Power of Failure.
Despite the very dire consequences of the latest financial crisis that Wall Street perpetrated on the world, America cannot seem to shake its infatuation with Wall Street bankers and traders.
We continue to shower them with riches, prestige and glory...
The question is why? Why do we tolerate the questionable morality and behavior that too many on Wall Street get rewarded to exhibit?
Perhaps the purpose of the article is merely to buttress the narrative, copyrighted by Sgt. Schultz of Hogans Heroes, that liberals know nothingNOTHING about Fannie and Freddie. But really, what does Cohan expect? This is not that hard. Big Government equals Big Debt, and when government wants to borrow it needs Wall Street.
Its not just the Feds that need money. The United States has a huge bestiary of governments, special purpose districts as well and state and local governments, and they all need to borrow money. Who do you think they call?
Closer to the truth is Charles Gasparino and his Bought and Paid For. He tells Shawn Macomber that Wall Street is actually not that capitalist, but that The people at the top have political beliefs that are strongly aligned with progressivism.
In any case, politiciansfounding father Alexander Hamilton exceptedare clueless about money. Heres an example, from The Merchant Bankers by Joseph Wechsberg. Its a story about the French. Youd expect the country of John Law and the assignat to need serious advice from a good finance professional, and you would be right.
After their victory in the Napoleonic Wars the victorsthe Brits and the Prussians and their hangers-ondemanded an indemnity from the defeated French of 700,000,000 francs. Newly installed Louis XVIII and his courtiers didnt have a clue what to do. But Paris investment banker Gabriel-Julien Ouvrard had an idea. Dont borrow from the rich in France with a compulsory loan, he said. Dont raise taxes. Float a bond issue in London and borrow the money from the victors. Everyone thought the guy was crazy. But he wasnt. British banker Barings and Amsterdam banker Hope & Co were happy to syndicate a loan for the French in the City. The bond issue sold out and the prices of French rentes went up. Everyone made lots of money, and, best of all, Louis XVIII got himself and the French people out of a jam so they could go on to lose three wars to the Germans in less than a century.
When a politician wants money, who does he turn to? He turns to a friendly investment banker, maybe the one that gave him a helpful investment tip a while back. He always has, and he always will.
Want to know why Wall Street honchos make so much more money that you do? Its because the money men are essential to the politicians, and you are not.
Also, the bankers take care of politicians in other ways. Guess who got to marry Chelsea Clinton? A son of politicians who had worked as a banker at Goldman Sachs and 3G Capital.
Heres an idea for all those liberals that want to reduce the influence of Wall Street. Cut back on government. Especially cut back on government debt. And that includes all the funny money that floats around quasi government operations like Fannie and Freddie. If Wall Street werent making all that easy money servicing the government they would have to figure out how to service the private sector. They might even end up accidentally creating good jobs and reducing inequality.
From a conservative point of view, the flap over Wall Street and its travails is not all bad. We hate the bailouts, but we love the political opportunity. Without the financial meltdown, the nation might have swallowed ObamaCare. Without the financial meltdown we could have put off the moment of truth with entitlements longer. Without the financial meltdown and the Obamanomic knee-jerk Keynesianism the Tea Party movement might not have gone critical.
Weve got the Wall Street we deserve. Decades of reckless government finance have created the monster that is too big to fail. All the liberal bluster will not change the real problem with meltdowns and bailouts, for it will be the little people, not Wall Street, that will pay the price for the failures of the big boys.
Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com. His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.
When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of agesthey seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990
In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society
We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.
E. G. West, Education and the State
Law being too tenuous to rely upon in [Ulster and the Scottish borderlands], people developed patterns of settling differences by personal fighting and family feuds.
Thomas Sowell, Conquests and Cultures
The primary thing to keep in mind about German and Russian thought since
1800 is that it takes for granted that the Cartesian, Lockean or Humean scientific and
philosophical conception of man and nature... has been shown by indisputable evidence to be
inadequate.
F.S.C. Northrop, The Meeting of East and West
Inquiry does not start unless there is a problem... It is the problem and its
characteristics revealed by analysis which guides one first to the relevant facts and then,
once the relevant facts are known, to the relevant hypotheses.
F.S.C. Northrop, The Logic of the Sciences and the Humanities
But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie
that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.
Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison
I mean three systems in one: a predominantly market economy; a polity respectful of the rights of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and a system of cultural institutions moved by ideals of liberty and justice for all.
In short, three dynamic and converging systems functioning as one: a democratic polity, an economy based on markets and incentives, and a moral-cultural system which is plural and, in the largest sense, liberal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism
The incentive that impels a man to act is always some uneasiness...
But to make a man act [he must have]
the expectation that purposeful behavior has the power to remove
or at least to alleviate the felt uneasiness.
Ludwig von Mises, Human Action
[In the] higher Christian churches… they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm
When we received Christ, Phil added, all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh
The recognition and integration of extralegal property rights [in the Homestead Act] was a key element in the United States becoming the most important market economy and producer of capital in the world.
Hernando de Soto, The Mystery of Capital
mysql close
©2007 Christopher Chantrill