home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Friday May 25, 2012 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 12

May 2012

Apr 2012

Mar 2012

Feb 2012

Jan 2012

BLOGS 11

Dec 2011

Nov 2011

Oct 2011

Sep 2011

Aug 2011

Jul 2011

Jun 2011

May 2011

Apr 2011

Mar 2011

Feb 2011

Jan 2011

BLOGS 10

Dec 2010

Nov 2010

Oct 2010

Sep 2010

Aug 2010

Jul 2010

Jun 2010

May 2010

Apr 2010

Mar 2010

Feb 2010

Jan 2010

BLOGS 09

Dec 2009

Nov 2009

Oct 2009

Sep 2009

Aug 2009

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

The Liberal Culture of Compulsion Social Security Isn't Broken

print view

Deflating Those Liberal Myths

by Christopher Chantrill
March 09, 2011 at 12:48 pm

|

OUR MEDIA chaps like to be first with the new cultural trend, the latest hot thing that young things are getting hot over. But they have another important role, and that is publicizing the Roadrunner moment—when Wile E. Coyote realizes that there’s nothing between him and the ground 2,000 feet below.

The Wall Street Journal’s Peggy Noonan is good at Roadrunner observances, and she nailed another one last Saturday by puncturing the liberal myth about unions. Public-sector unions, she wrote, are friendly in the way that the “selfish, bullying union chief Johnny Friendly” in On the Waterfront is friendly.

Allow me to translate. Peggy is telling her liberal friends that the gig is up on the myth of labor unions as the friends of the little guy. So another liberal myth hits the dirt.

For over a century our liberal friends have insisted that labor unions are right there on the front lines fighting for the rights of workers. But this is baloney. Labor unions have always fought for some workers against other workers. When they were medieval guilds unions were fighting for the city artisans against cheap labor from the countryside. If you were a peasant, you could forget about getting work in the city, thanks to the city guilds. When they staged their first successful strikes by shutting down the railroad, the railroad unions were fighting for the well-paid railroad workers against the ordinary working stiff. In the 1930s unions were fighting for the Davis-Bacon Act to keep low-paid Negro labor out of the urban North and they were fighting for well-paid auto workers against people who might, some day, be able to afford an automobile. When labor unions fight against child labor they are helping keep capable teenagers locked up in K-12 government child custodial facilities (where children are expected to work for nothing) so they can’t compete for jobs with union members. When labor unions are agitating for minimum wages they are trying to force low-paid, entry-level workers out of the job market.

Now we have well-paid government-employee union members stiffing the ordinary taxpayer, and it looks like it’s all over for Wile E. Coyote in the Looney Tunes favorite “Roadrunner and the Union Brothers.”

Don’t get me wrong. I don’t have a problem with unions. There are a ton of people that don’t get the capitalist offering. They come to the city and figure that political power is the coin of the city, just like it was back on the farm, where you needed a powerful patron to survive. It takes a generation for most people to twig to the truth, that capitalism is a system that rewards the chap, and he’s usually a middle-class nobody, that comes up with some new, improved product that consumers want to buy. Call it hitting the innovation jackpot. Plus, capitalism rewards the guys that work for the guy that hit the innovation jackpot. Until people figure this out, the safest place for them is a labor union or a political machine.

So much for the labor-union myth. But what about all those other pernicious liberal myths that serve no social purpose but serve, as the postmodernists so cleverly put it, as narratives to justify liberal political power?

There’s the narrative about FDR getting the United States out of the Great Depression. He did it so well that liberals are determined to use the same methods to get out of the Great Recession, even if it means burying every Democratic voter in money.

There’s the narrative about government education. Since the United States has had about 90 percent literacy for 200 years, with and without government schools, it’s hard to see the benefit, except the advantage of teachers paying union dues to their unions and the unions spending the money on politicians.

There’s the idea that without economic and social legislation, we’d all be working in sweat-shops. It’s odd how that worked out. Today the poor are protected from evil exploiters, the children of the rich gladly work 80 hour weeks as associates in law firms.

Frankly, I’m past being angered by these dying liberal myths: I’m just tired of them. I’d rather talk about good improving conservative myths, like the idea that the United States is the last best hope of mankind on earth. Or try this one on for size. Somewhere out there in America there’s a conservative black kid that’s going to grow up to be president. (You think America is ready to vote for a black conservative president?)

Some day, of course, today’s conservative myths will go the way of the deflating liberal myths that justify the rule of the today’s Ruling Class. But not yet.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison


Civil Society

“Civil Society”—a complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churches—builds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust


Hugo on Genius

“Tear down theory, poetic systems… No more rules, no more models… Genius conjures up rather than learns… ” —Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois


Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State


Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990


Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh


Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy


Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006


China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing


Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Conservatism

Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


mysql close

 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill