home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Friday May 25, 2012 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 12

May 2012

Apr 2012

Mar 2012

Feb 2012

Jan 2012

BLOGS 11

Dec 2011

Nov 2011

Oct 2011

Sep 2011

Aug 2011

Jul 2011

Jun 2011

May 2011

Apr 2011

Mar 2011

Feb 2011

Jan 2011

BLOGS 10

Dec 2010

Nov 2010

Oct 2010

Sep 2010

Aug 2010

Jul 2010

Jun 2010

May 2010

Apr 2010

Mar 2010

Feb 2010

Jan 2010

BLOGS 09

Dec 2009

Nov 2009

Oct 2009

Sep 2009

Aug 2009

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

Unaccountable America Who Will Mediscare the Dems?

print view

The End of Medicare As We Know It

by Christopher Chantrill
April 16, 2011 at 12:57 pm

|

AS USUAL, Mark Steyn has comically grasped the essence of the budget problem. Democrats are right, he admits, when they say that the Ryan Budget Plan means the end of Medicare as we know it. But let’s be honest about the alternative.

The Democrats’ “plan” — business as usual — will end America as we know it.

That’s because under the Democrats’ business as usual, we will end up Greece or Ireland or Portugal where the government can’t borrow money at the rates offered by the money market. According to Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff in This Time is Different, you typically get to Default City when a government is facing about 10 percent of GDP in annual interest payments.

Meanwhile, in Washington State, we’ve already ended Medicare as we know it, and I’m part of the reason why. I’ll be 65 in about three months and it’s time to sign up for Medicare. I’m thinking of abandoning my conservative principles and signing up for Medicare Advantage with Seattle’s Group Health Cooperative. That way I won’t be buying a Medigap policy from the dreaded AARP.

There are three collective institutions that proudly define the essence of liberal Seattle. There is PCC Natural Markets, “a certified organic grocery store & Seattle Washington co-op;” there is REI, the outdoor clothing and gear co-op, and there in Group Health, “a consumer-governed, nonprofit health care system that coordinates care and coverage.”

According to Group Health’s website, it seems that you can’t get ordinary Medicare at Group Health. For individuals, the choice is between an “Individual & Family” plan or “Medicare Advantage.” So much for the idea that ObamaCare was going to slit the throat of Medicare Advantage. It won’t happen here in Washington State. Talk to a liberal about Group Health and she will get a faraway look in her eye. If she’s over 65 she’s on Medicare Advantage at Group Health.

I figure that long before the Louisiana Purchase and the Cornhusker Kickback and the notorious ObamaCare “waivers” that Seattle liberals already made their Immaculate Reception. Here’s a nickel that says that Sen. Patty Murray (D), Sen. Maria Cantwell (D), Rep. “Baghdad” Jim McDermott (D) and the rest of the Washington State (D) crew got themselves a deal with the White House to protect Group Health. Only you and I never got to hear about it.

GHC has several Medicare Advantage programs and I plan to sign up for the one with the biggest deductible. It makes quite a difference. The plan with the maximum annual out-of-pocket expense of $3,200 has a monthly payment of $19. The plan with the minimum out-of-pocket expense of $1,000 costs $210 a month. On top of that, you get to pay $115.40 a month directly to the Feds; that amount comes off your Social Security check. For reference, my current individual health insurance plan costs me $168.94 a month with a $5,000 deductible.

It’s good to know that Seattle liberals have taken care of themselves even as they try to sicc ObamaCare on the rest of us. The nomenclatura always takes care of its own.

It will need to, because the Ryan Budget Plan, now available at usgovernmentspending.com, is going to take chunk out of liberal programs. Compared to the president’s budget, Ryan proposes to spend $1 trillion less per year by 2021. Here’s a chart of it all:

That one trillion dollars doesn’t look like much on the chart, but if features $244 billion less in interest, $225 billion less in “other mandatory” programs, $233 billion from ObamaCare repeal, and $140 billion from Medicaid reform. And that is all before 2022, the year of the end of Medicare as we know it.

Here is the great question in our national politics. If we chop a trillion a year off federal spending will it hurt or help the most vulnerable? Is the problem too few government programs or too many government programs? Conservatives say that the problem is that government handouts encourage and foster social pathologies. Liberals say that social problems are caused by outsourcing, by corporate power, by budget cuts, and by general conservative meanness.

But this great issue will not be decided on its merits. More likely, it will turn on minor questions. Perhaps Americans will cut the welfare state in a fit of pique about liberal double standards. You know the sort of thing: How liberals enjoy tenure and state-guaranteed pensions while ordinary people watch their 401(k) accounts get ravaged by financial crisis and inflation, or how liberals dealt themselves a cozy deal on Medicare Advantage in Washington State.

But now liberal President Obama is going to present his own spending reduction plan. A liberal proposing spending cuts? That really would be the end of America as we know it.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990


Mutual Aid

In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society


Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State


Living Under Law

Law being too tenuous to rely upon in [Ulster and the Scottish borderlands], people developed patterns of settling differences by personal fighting and family feuds.
Thomas Sowell, Conquests and Cultures


German Philosophy

The primary thing to keep in mind about German and Russian thought since 1800 is that it takes for granted that the Cartesian, Lockean or Humean scientific and philosophical conception of man and nature... has been shown by indisputable evidence to be inadequate. 
F.S.C. Northrop, The Meeting of East and West


Knowledge

Inquiry does not start unless there is a problem... It is the problem and its characteristics revealed by analysis which guides one first to the relevant facts and then, once the relevant facts are known, to the relevant hypotheses.
F.S.C. Northrop, The Logic of the Sciences and the Humanities


Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison


Democratic Capitalism

I mean three systems in one: a predominantly market economy; a polity respectful of the rights of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and a system of cultural institutions moved by ideals of liberty and justice for all. In short, three dynamic and converging systems functioning as one: a democratic polity, an economy based on markets and incentives, and a moral-cultural system which is plural and, in the largest sense, liberal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Action

The incentive that impels a man to act is always some uneasiness... But to make a man act [he must have] the expectation that purposeful behavior has the power to remove or at least to alleviate the felt uneasiness.
Ludwig von Mises, Human Action


Churches

[In the] higher Christian churches… they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm


Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh


Living Law

The recognition and integration of extralegal property rights [in the Homestead Act] was a key element in the United States becoming the most important market economy and producer of capital in the world.
Hernando de Soto, The Mystery of Capital


mysql close

 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill