home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Friday May 25, 2012 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 12

May 2012

Apr 2012

Mar 2012

Feb 2012

Jan 2012

BLOGS 11

Dec 2011

Nov 2011

Oct 2011

Sep 2011

Aug 2011

Jul 2011

Jun 2011

May 2011

Apr 2011

Mar 2011

Feb 2011

Jan 2011

BLOGS 10

Dec 2010

Nov 2010

Oct 2010

Sep 2010

Aug 2010

Jul 2010

Jun 2010

May 2010

Apr 2010

Mar 2010

Feb 2010

Jan 2010

BLOGS 09

Dec 2009

Nov 2009

Oct 2009

Sep 2009

Aug 2009

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

Government and Failure Education for What?

print view

A "New Model School" Opens in London

by Christopher Chantrill
October 02, 2004 at 8:00 pm

|

BACK IN THE nineteenth century, before the educated elite had taken an interest in education, ordinary people paid to send their children to school.  In England they paid 3d or 6d per week (i.e. about 25 cents in nineteenth century US dollars) at the most basic schools.  The result was that by 1870 when the state decided to take over child education to “fill in the gaps” the literacy rate in England was about 90 percent.  Now, of course, things are much better, for only about 30 percent of the graduates of England’s “bog standard” comprehensive schools remain functionally illiterate, according to social commentator Theodore Dalrymple. 

In England, as in the United States, some souls have dared to wonder whether a one-size-fits-all government monopoly is the best way to educate children.  They wonder whether a million parents making individual decisions about the education of their children might outperform thousands of education bureaucrats and experts making those decisions for them. 

The folks at Civitas, a British think tank devoted to the study of civil society, decided to do something about it.  They decided to demonstrate that they could run a private school for working people that delivered a basic education for about $5,000 per year, significantly less than the cost of a full-service private school.

On September 13, 2004, the first New Model School—“excellent and affordable private schools”—opened in a sports center in Queen’s Park in Northwest London.  It is starting with one teacher and one aide, and is accepting 4-5 year olds in its “reception year.”  The schools will use the “direct instruction” method that has achieved significant success in the United States (click here for more info).  Parents at the New Model School are expected to volunteer and “to foster attitudes of respect and courtesy in their children.”  The cost is 900 UK pounds per term.

The New Model School is opening in Queen’s Park in response to interest expressed by local parents.  It is intended, of course, as a template, a model that can be applied by interested parents anywhere in Britain.  The New Model School concept is ready to be expanded into a chain of local schools, starting like the Queen’s Park unit in a sports or church facility and only moving to permanent buildings after demonstrating viability.

This modest educational startup has attracted some notice.  The World Socialist complained that by opening the Queen’s Park school in a racially mixed area “Civitas was playing on middle-class fears of the racial mix in local schools.”  But it took heart that “most people view organisations such as Civitas with extreme suspicion.”  Fortunately only 10 children had enrolled with a week to go before school opened.  Of course the real problem was that, by “grossly underfunding” its schools the British government had created a climate in which right-wing think tanks could thrive and pursue their “reactionary agenda.”

The Guardian reported on the school opening, and quoted “former immigration minister” Barbara Roche, who had received a fundraising letter from Civitas that “alarmed” her.  She wondered if schools were now “going to be established that will attack our multiracial, multicultural society.”

Only Sarah Harris at The Daily Mail managed to report the opening without ideological bias, discussing New Model School’s fees in as the educational equivalent of budget airlines and hotels, a low-cost alternative to elite schools like Eton, Harrow, and Winchester that charge 20,000 pounds per year, and the mid-range chain of schools being developed by Global Education Management Systems (Gems) that aims to deliver an education at 10,000 pounds per year.

It’s a novel concept for the modern parent—paying for your child’s education.  In the old days, of course, parents made harrowing sacrifices to get their children a basic grounding in literacy and numeracy.  James Mill, father of John Stuart Mill, observed in the early nineteenth century that parents subsisted on potatoes so they could scrape up the cash to pay their children’s school fees.  And Jacob Riis at the end of the nineteenth century noted that in New York the only reason that immigrant parents did not send their children to school was when they needed the child’s wages to eat.

Yet in our modern era governments assume that parents have to be enticed with “free” schools and flogged with compulsory education laws to deliver their children up to the advantage of education. 

Still, the lefties are right to rail against the New Model School startup.  Children that learn to love books and develop an attitude of respect and courtesy aren’t going to turn into the kind of people that the left knows and loves:  helpless victims or transgressive activists.  Instead they might turn into law-abiding purposeful adults, capable of self-government, the Anglosphere’s gift to the world.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


What Liberals Think About Conservatives

[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008


Socialism equals Animism

Imagining that all order is the result of design, socialists conclude that order must be improvable by better design of some superior mind.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Sacrifice

[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values


Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Racial Discrimination

[T]he way “to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,” Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300–301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District


Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy


Physics, Religion, and Psychology

Paul Dirac: “When I was talking with Lemaître about [the expanding universe] and feeling stimulated by the grandeur of the picture that he has given us, I told him that I thought cosmology was the branch of science that lies closest to religion. However [Georges] Lemaître [Catholic priest, physicist, and inventor of the Big Bang Theory] did not agree with me. After thinking it over he suggested psychology as lying closest to religion.”
John Farrell, “The Creation Myth”


Pentecostalism

Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization


Never Trust Experts

No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome: if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent: if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe. They all require their strong wine diluted by a very large admixture of insipid common sense.
Lord Salisbury, “Letter to Lord Lytton”


Mutual Aid

In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society


mysql close

 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill