home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Friday May 25, 2012 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 12

May 2012

Apr 2012

Mar 2012

Feb 2012

Jan 2012

BLOGS 11

Dec 2011

Nov 2011

Oct 2011

Sep 2011

Aug 2011

Jul 2011

Jun 2011

May 2011

Apr 2011

Mar 2011

Feb 2011

Jan 2011

BLOGS 10

Dec 2010

Nov 2010

Oct 2010

Sep 2010

Aug 2010

Jul 2010

Jun 2010

May 2010

Apr 2010

Mar 2010

Feb 2010

Jan 2010

BLOGS 09

Dec 2009

Nov 2009

Oct 2009

Sep 2009

Aug 2009

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

Postmodernism's Take on "Flake" Journalism Where Obamanomics Went Wrong

print view

Is Head-Smashed-In the Solution to Smash-Mouth Politics?

by Christopher Chantrill
July 09, 2011 at 12:30 pm

|

LET’S give the president and his base the benefit of the doubt. President Obama honestly thought that his smash-mouth press conference on Wednesday June 29th and his obsession over the Obama-Reid-Pelosi corporate jet stimulus tax credit was nothing more than good presidential leadership. No doubt the gay marriage advocates think that there arm-twisting victory on gay marriage in the New York State Senate was nothing more than a principled effort to right an age-old injustice. Ditto the smash-mouth chappies on MSNBC.

Does the playground bully think he is a bully? Certainly not. He just thinks that the kids he bullies around are losers.

The reason for civility in politics and manners in individuals is not just that it’s the right thing to do. The bigger reason is that polite people and civil politicians avoid making unnecessary enemies. For politicians, enemies become a real problem when they add up to more than 49 percent of the vote.

Rage and protest are all very well when you are in opposition—as our Democratic friends ably demonstrated through the eight long years of the Bush administration. But rage and smash-mouth politics from the governing party is just plain thuggery. When you pack the National Labor Relations Board with your cronies (see Boeing) and the National Mediation Council with your pals (see Delta) to harass non-union corporations and employees and change the rules without benefit of Congress then ordinary people start to get angry and fearful. They know they don’t have much power, and the mainstream media doesn’t give a fig for them. What can they do?

That’s where Head-Smashed-In comes in. No, it’s not what you think. Head-Smashed-In is a provincial park near Fort McLeod, Alberta. It’s a buffalo jump where First Nation peoples for thousands of years stampeded the North American bison off a cliff. You may have the impression, from pictures like this, that native Americans hunted buffalo from horseback. So they did, after the Spaniards introduced domestic horses to North America in about 1500.

In the centuries before the spread of horses northwards across the Great Plains, First Nations peoples hunted buffalo on foot, and they developed the Buffalo Jump all across the plains as an effective way to harvest the meat and hides of the North American bison.

Here’s an idea. Why not use the same tactics if you are a subject people without the financial or cultural power to deploy your own smash-mouth politicians and activists.? Choose your moment and then stampede your opponents over a political cliff.

But how can our Democratic friends be persuaded to jump off a cliff like a herd of buffalo? Aren’t Democrats all supposed to be creative individualists doing their own thing? Ann Coulter in Demonic thinks not. She gently reminds us that our liberal friends have had a weakness for the madness of crowds and mob rule ever since their favorite foreigners, the French, made the Paris mob into a player in the French Revolution. Remember how the mob eventually bayed for the blood of thug dictator Maximilien Robespierre? “There goes the dirty maximum,” they jeered, when Max’s economic policy of price controls had failed to curb prices or deliver badly needed stimulus during the quantitative easing of the 1790s. Of course Democrats don’t call their thuggish activists “mobs.” They call them “peaceful protesters.”

Maybe there is no need for Republicans to stampede the Democrats next year. In December 2012, as we view the steaming heap of sacred cows that stampeded to red ruin off the Progressive Cliffs, it need not be the work of cunning neo-Rovian political operatives. The Democratic peaceful protesters may stampede themselves over the cliff. Look how many cliffs they have already jumped off since 2009.

First the Reid-Pelosi Congress stampeded off the Stimulus Jump, then Reid and Pelosi chased their herd over the ObamaCare Cliffs. Then the Wisconsin State Senate Democrats stampeded off to Illinois while their supporters milled around in an angry mob in the Madison state capitol. Now, to cap it all, President Obama is trying to frighten a skittish Congress all riled up about the debt ceiling and stampede it over the Tax Jump.

As they say: never interfere with the opposition when they are busily making a big mistake. If the Democrats want to stampede their whole party over a buffalo jump, who has the right to stop them? But somebody is going to get their head smashed in over this. Like the First Nations kid centuries ago at Head Smashed-In Buffalo Jump who thought he’d watch the bison jumping to red ruin from the safety of the cliff overhang.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


What Liberals Think About Conservatives

[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican


Racial Discrimination

[T]he way “to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,” Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300–301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District


Liberal Coercion

[T]he Liberal, and still more the subspecies Radical... more than any other in these latter days seems under the impression that so long as he has a good end in view he is warranted in exercising over men all the coercion he is able[.]
Herbert Spencer, The Man Versus the State


Churches

[In the] higher Christian churches… they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm


Sacrifice

[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values


Pentecostalism

Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization


Conservatism's Holy Grail

What distinguishes true Conservatism from the rest, and from the Blair project, is the belief in more personal freedom and more market freedom, along with less state intervention... The true Third Way is the Holy Grail of Tory politics today - compassion and community without compulsion.
Minette Marrin, The Daily Telegraph


Moral Imperatives of Modern Culture

These emerge out of long-standing moral notions of freedom, benevolence, and the affirmation of ordinary life... I have been sketching a schematic map... [of] the moral sources [of these notions]... the original theistic grounding for these standards... a naturalism of disengaged reason, which in our day takes scientistic forms, and a third family of views which finds its sources in Romantic expressivism, or in one of the modernist successor visions.
Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self


Drang nach Osten

There was nothing new about the Frankish drive to the east... [let] us recall that the continuance of their rule depended upon regular, successful, predatory warfare.
Richard Fletcher, The Barbarian Conversion


Government Expenditure

The Union publishes an exact return of the amount of its taxes; I can get copies of the budgets of the four and twenty component states; but who can tell me what the citizens spend in the administration of county and township?
Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America


Living Law

The recognition and integration of extralegal property rights [in the Homestead Act] was a key element in the United States becoming the most important market economy and producer of capital in the world.
Hernando de Soto, The Mystery of Capital


German Philosophy

The primary thing to keep in mind about German and Russian thought since 1800 is that it takes for granted that the Cartesian, Lockean or Humean scientific and philosophical conception of man and nature... has been shown by indisputable evidence to be inadequate. 
F.S.C. Northrop, The Meeting of East and West


mysql close

 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill