home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Friday May 25, 2012 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 12

May 2012

Apr 2012

Mar 2012

Feb 2012

Jan 2012

BLOGS 11

Dec 2011

Nov 2011

Oct 2011

Sep 2011

Aug 2011

Jul 2011

Jun 2011

May 2011

Apr 2011

Mar 2011

Feb 2011

Jan 2011

BLOGS 10

Dec 2010

Nov 2010

Oct 2010

Sep 2010

Aug 2010

Jul 2010

Jun 2010

May 2010

Apr 2010

Mar 2010

Feb 2010

Jan 2010

BLOGS 09

Dec 2009

Nov 2009

Oct 2009

Sep 2009

Aug 2009

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

A "New Model School" Opens in London On Derridology

print view

Education for What?

by Christopher Chantrill
October 09, 2004 at 8:00 pm

|

LONDON’S ECONOMIST published a handy chart this week to help eager parents game the British education system.  The objective: to place your child in a “top university.”  To get there you’ll have to pony up lots of cash: to pay for private schooling, to pay the premium of up to 20 percent on housing in the catchment area of a good school, or to pay for private tutoring.  Prime Minister Tony Blair has done as well as anyone in gaming the system.  His children attend a highly desired Catholic school and are topped up with private tutors from one of Britain’s most prestigious private schools.

The British government-run school system has been designed by left-wing egalitarians to prevent middle-class parents from “privileging” their children by giving them an education that other parents can’t afford.  In short, they want to make it hard for professional parents to get their children into “top universities.”

At least the parents and the egalitarians agree on one point, the Vince Lombardian idea that getting into a “top university” is the only thing that matters.  There’s only one question.  What if they are wrong?  Or for the conspiracy minded, what if they are deliberately misdirecting us?  What if they are concentrating the minds of the reading public upon getting into a “top university” merely as a diversion?

After all, it’s no secret that many of the most remarkable people in the modern era never went close to a “top university.”  John D. Rockefeller went to bookkeeping school.  And Bill Gates dropped out of Harvard so he could start a business.  Of course, that didn’t stop them later on from hiring the best and the brightest to staff and run their evil corporate monopolies.

It’s also no secret that boys are turning away from universities, and indeed, from schooling in general.  Women already represent the majority of university graduates, and are expected to account for up to 60 percent of college graduates by the end of the decade.  Conservative policy analysts have been warning for years that the liberal fixation on improving girls’ access to education is blind to the facts: girls thrive on the sit-down receptive school system, but boys hate it.

What do boys want?  It’s a good question.  Our western society has spent the last century pondering Freud’s worry about what women wanted.  But it has always known never to ask that question of boys.  We know what they want.  They want to gang up with other boys and go around breaking things.  Human society has understood since the dawn of time that the one thing needful is to put a stop to gangs of boys roaming around breaking things.  But how?

It’s easy.  Instead of leaving them to their natural gang-up instincts, we raise them to join teams and go around building things.  As a sweetener, we have ordained that the first task in every building job is called: “Excavation and Demolition.”

Now that the sit-down education system has admitted defeat on the boy front and started tranquilizing the most boyish boys with drugs, it’s time to return to the good old ways.  We must raise boys to join teams.

There’s a simple difference between a gang and a team.  A gang is led by an adolescent.  A team is led by an adult.  That is what Robert Baden-Powell understood when he founded the Boy Scouts movement.  He wanted to get at weedy cigarette-smoking ten-year-old punks before the gang did, and raise them to the culture of the team.

Notice how the left admires the culture of the gang: the revolutionary adolescent like Ernesto “Che” Guevara, the perpetually adolescent rock musician, the transgressive artist intent upon “challenging” society.  On the other hand the right admires the culture of the team: Boy Scouts, athletic teams, armies, and corporations.  Lee Harris in Civilization and Its Enemies has contrasted these two cultures.  The signal success of the West, he wrote, has been its development of the culture of the team to fight the eternal gang of ruthless men.

A change in the culture of education from girly seats-on-chairs to manly adventurous teams couldn’t come too soon.  While society has been wondering what women want, boys have found a new gang culture.  It is called Halo, the major game available on Microsoft’s X-box video game console.  In Halo II, available in stores this fall, a boy can create a virtual gang with any on-line boy in the world and then head out for a bit of shoot-em-up mayhem.

While our political masters busy themselves with controlling who gets into the “top universities” and counting how many historically marginalized students can fit on the head of a pin, we may be losing a whole generation of boys to virtual gangs.  It’s up to us to figure out what to do. The Schoolmen are otherwise engaged.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990


Mutual Aid

In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society


Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State


Living Under Law

Law being too tenuous to rely upon in [Ulster and the Scottish borderlands], people developed patterns of settling differences by personal fighting and family feuds.
Thomas Sowell, Conquests and Cultures


German Philosophy

The primary thing to keep in mind about German and Russian thought since 1800 is that it takes for granted that the Cartesian, Lockean or Humean scientific and philosophical conception of man and nature... has been shown by indisputable evidence to be inadequate. 
F.S.C. Northrop, The Meeting of East and West


Knowledge

Inquiry does not start unless there is a problem... It is the problem and its characteristics revealed by analysis which guides one first to the relevant facts and then, once the relevant facts are known, to the relevant hypotheses.
F.S.C. Northrop, The Logic of the Sciences and the Humanities


Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison


Democratic Capitalism

I mean three systems in one: a predominantly market economy; a polity respectful of the rights of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and a system of cultural institutions moved by ideals of liberty and justice for all. In short, three dynamic and converging systems functioning as one: a democratic polity, an economy based on markets and incentives, and a moral-cultural system which is plural and, in the largest sense, liberal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Action

The incentive that impels a man to act is always some uneasiness... But to make a man act [he must have] the expectation that purposeful behavior has the power to remove or at least to alleviate the felt uneasiness.
Ludwig von Mises, Human Action


Churches

[In the] higher Christian churches… they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm


Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh


Living Law

The recognition and integration of extralegal property rights [in the Homestead Act] was a key element in the United States becoming the most important market economy and producer of capital in the world.
Hernando de Soto, The Mystery of Capital


mysql close

 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill