home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Friday May 25, 2012 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 12

May 2012

Apr 2012

Mar 2012

Feb 2012

Jan 2012

BLOGS 11

Dec 2011

Nov 2011

Oct 2011

Sep 2011

Aug 2011

Jul 2011

Jun 2011

May 2011

Apr 2011

Mar 2011

Feb 2011

Jan 2011

BLOGS 10

Dec 2010

Nov 2010

Oct 2010

Sep 2010

Aug 2010

Jul 2010

Jun 2010

May 2010

Apr 2010

Mar 2010

Feb 2010

Jan 2010

BLOGS 09

Dec 2009

Nov 2009

Oct 2009

Sep 2009

Aug 2009

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

Losing Ohio Why Americans Are Anti-Intellectual

print view

I Double Dare You!

by Christopher Chantrill
December 04, 2004 at 7:00 pm

|

THIS CHRISTMAS, I am doubling my customary contributions to the Salvation Army and to the Boy Scouts of America.  And so should you.

I wish I could say my decision was prompted an exquisite reason, but it was not.  I have, as they say, no good reason, but I have reason good enough.  My reason is to stick it in the eye of the liberals.

Back in the 1990s when the liberals last cocked a snook at the National Rifle Association I responded decisively.  I went straight to the NRA website and contributed $100.  When the mainstream media started to rumble against the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, I googled up their website, and contributed $100.  This year I’m all riled up about the Salvation Army and the Boy Scouts, and so should you.

Someone (and I wonder who) has come up with the bright idea that big retail stores shouldn’t allow the Salvation Army bell ringers to solicit at their doors because it’s not right to show favoritism to one charity over another.  So Target and Mervyn’s, among others one presumes, decided not to allow the Salvation Army to solicit for contributions at their stores this year.

This sort of thing really gets me riled up.  It sends me to a-googling, looking up websites where I can make on-line contributions.  Talk show host Hugh Hewitt is riled up too, and he’s running a campaign to shame Target into revoking its ban.  Mervyn’s has already caved. 

The Salvation Army is founded upon the radical notion that the life of a selfish loser and a drunk can be utterly transformed by a practical helping hand and by the faith that Jesus cares about him and loves him.  And it works.

I’m going to double my usual $100 contribution to the Salvation Army.  I dare you to do the same.

Then there’s the Boy Scouts of America.  Lord Baden Powell started the Boy Scout movement because he wanted to take ten-year-old cigarette-smoking toughs off the city sidewalks and remake them in the image of army scouts, the kind he had led in the Boer War. 

It is, of course, entirely appropriate that the ACLU and other liberal activist groups are harrassing the Boy Scouts.  If the Boy Scouts are right that the way to socialize young boys in the inner cities is through faith in God, service to the community, and an education for outdoor adventure, then the liberal program of socialization: one-size-fits-all government schools, Ritalin, single parent families, and gay scoutmasters is all wrong. 

And if that were true, what would the liberals in their sinecures do then, poor things.

In The Enemies of Civilization, Lee Harris recently explained why the Boy Scout idea works.  The great achievement of western civilization since the Greeks, he explained, has been to transform the natural teenage boys’ gang culture into the culture of the team.  The animating idea of the West is its war against the “eternal gang of ruthless men.”  It fights this war by socializing teenage boys into teams, from sexual predators into husbands.  The gang fights just to rape and pillage; the team fights to build order and increase.  In the old days the Greeks molded their youth into hoplite heavy infantry; today we mold college graduates infantilized by liberal professors into world-beating corporate teams. 

The British figured it out.  With Baden Powell, they learned how to turn their urban youth from the culture of the gang to the culture of the team.  Even the Germans figured it out.  General von Seekt determined to build an army of soldiers that were “self-reliant, self-confident, dedicated, and joyful in taking responsibility.”  It is not, of course, an accident that the culture of the armed forces of the United States is drenched in the ideology of the team.

In its early years, the Boy Scouts had a bit a problem with pedophiles, who naturally seek out opportunities for interaction with young boys.  They decided not to allow avowed homosexuals to act as scoutmasters.  They instituted, as self-governing societies will, a sensible rule to further protect their boys from sexual predation.  They decided that an adult could never be alone with a scout.  William Tucker explained a few years ago what this rule means in practice.  If a scout gets ill at camp and has to go home, then two adults must drive him the 40 miles to the bus station.  And then drive back to camp.

Liberals are right to attack the Salvation Army and the Boy Scouts of America.  They stand for everything that liberals abhor.  But we should support these venerable institutions that celebrate the Anglospheric idea of self-government.  You can contribute to the Salvation Army at www.1800salarmy.org.  You can contribute to the Boy Scouts of America at www.givetobsa.org. 

Go ahead: Double your contribution.  I dare you!

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


What Liberals Think About Conservatives

[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008


Socialism equals Animism

Imagining that all order is the result of design, socialists conclude that order must be improvable by better design of some superior mind.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Sacrifice

[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values


Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Racial Discrimination

[T]he way “to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,” Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300–301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District


Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy


Physics, Religion, and Psychology

Paul Dirac: “When I was talking with Lemaître about [the expanding universe] and feeling stimulated by the grandeur of the picture that he has given us, I told him that I thought cosmology was the branch of science that lies closest to religion. However [Georges] Lemaître [Catholic priest, physicist, and inventor of the Big Bang Theory] did not agree with me. After thinking it over he suggested psychology as lying closest to religion.”
John Farrell, “The Creation Myth”


Pentecostalism

Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization


Never Trust Experts

No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome: if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent: if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe. They all require their strong wine diluted by a very large admixture of insipid common sense.
Lord Salisbury, “Letter to Lord Lytton”


Mutual Aid

In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society


mysql close

 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill