home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Saturday August 30, 2014 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 14

Aug 2014

Jul 2014

Jun 2014

May 2014

Apr 2014

Mar 2014

Feb 2014

Jan 2014

BLOGS 13

Dec 2013

Nov 2013

Oct 2013

Sep 2013

Aug 2013

Jul 2013

Jun 2013

May 2013

Apr 2013

Mar 2013

Feb 2013

Jan 2013

BLOGS 12

Dec 2012

Nov 2012

Oct 2012

Sep 2012

Aug 2012

Jul 2012

Jun 2012

May 2012

Apr 2012

Mar 2012

Feb 2012

Jan 2012

BLOGS 11

Dec 2011

Nov 2011

Oct 2011

Sep 2011

Aug 2011

Jul 2011

Jun 2011

May 2011

Apr 2011

Mar 2011

Feb 2011

Jan 2011

BLOGS 10

Dec 2010

Nov 2010

Oct 2010

Sep 2010

Aug 2010

Jul 2010

Jun 2010

May 2010

Apr 2010

Mar 2010

Feb 2010

Jan 2010

BLOGS 09

Dec 2009

Nov 2009

Oct 2009

Sep 2009

Aug 2009

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

Why Liberals Hate Inequality Dr. Ben Carson and the Responsible Self

print view

The Liberal Bubble of Self-Deceit

by Christopher Chantrill
February 12, 2013 at 11:56 am

|

BACK IN 2008 I decided to vote for Barack Obama because I wanted the Democrats in charge of foreign policy. I never thought that they would do a good job, but I felt they needed to own US foreign policy for a while. For eight years they had been ragging on President Bush as the stupidest, most warmongering president in history, who was flushing civil liberties down the toilet with his Patriot Act. But now, Andrew McCarthy writes:

After four years of watching Obama enthusiastically adopt what he once condemned, we now know Bush detractors were animated by politics, not conviction. We now know that, across a broad spectrum of Obama progressives and national-security conservatives, there is consensus about an aggressive counterterrorism model.

OK, so the liberals finally signed onto the war on terror, kinda, sorta, but don’t tell anyone. Now, McCarthy urges, we need the president to push for a “national security court to deal with the unique legal challenges of a war against transnational terrorists.”

President Obama could do it — he could deliver plenty of Democrats. Together with the strong Republican support that is guaranteed, we could very quickly have an enduring, constitutionally sound counterterrorism framework. We could craft legislation that provides broad executive discretion but avoids the dangerous excesses of the Justice Department white paper.

Only President Obama won’t lead. He just had the Attorney General produce a secret white paper that authorizes him to kill Americans that act as enemy combatants. But forget about formalizing his policy in legislation.

You can see why. The president and his fellow Democrats are afraid to lead their progressive base back onto the reservation. They spent the entire decade of the 2000s raging about Bush the mad bomber and human-rights violator, and now they can’t face their base and break the bubble of deceit.

It’s the same with domestic policy. Democrats won’t touch entitlement reform. Instead they keep driving their voters towards the buffalo jump that will send grannie’s Medicare over the cliff.

And so on, with welfare, global warming, mortgage mayhem. Arthur Laffer has a piece in the Wall Street Journal about how a woman on welfare with two kids usually faces a marginal tax rate of about 100 percent if she starts to work. No wonder the president wants to increase the marginal tax rate on the rich—just to make it fair.

What do Democrats really think is right for the country? Never mind. If it doesn’t keep the Democratic majority steadily emerging they are not interested.

So liberals have to deceive themselves. It all started right after the Great Society legislation. According to Charles Murray in Losing Ground liberals had instrumented their new programs with lots of reporting so they could measure and trumpet their success to the world. When the programs didn’t work out, and the reports showed it, liberals sent the reports straight to the stacks. It’s been that way ever since.

Here’s some reality for you. Mr. Skinflint here has finally sprung for a copy of Thomas Sowell’s Basic Economics at Half Price Books. At $9.99, why not?

Dr. Sowell sensibly starts out his book with “The Role of Prices.” Really, everyone should read Sowell on prices once a year. You need to do that in order to flush out all the mainstream media misdirection, not to mention the special-interest ifs, ands and buts, that endlessly muddy your brain.

Sowell writes about price controls, especially rent controls. The science is in on rent controls: has been for decades. They reduce the supply of housing, they result in housing decay and abandonment. And the rich benefit while the poor get screwed. Still, even the black Sowell family got to benefit from the rent control in New York City in World War II and actually contributed to the housing shortage. But they didn’t have a clue what was wrong. Sowell admits the shameful truth:

My own family, which occupied a two-bedroom apartment in 1939, before the war, occupied two apartments with a total of four bedrooms in 1944, and of course two kitchens and two bathrooms. Yet we were as baffled as everyone else as to why there was a housing shortage.

It’s not too hard to understand how liberals manage to live in denial about rent control. Maybe they have a friend with a rent-controlled apartment. Maybe grannie is panicking at giving up the apartment she’s had for 50 years. And of course, if you were the New York Times, you wouldn’t want to rile up your liberal readers with unpleasant truths about basic economics.

I suppose that’s the reason we have speech codes, and the mainstream media doesn’t want to talk about the lefty politics of the LA police killer. Liberals need to stay safe in their bubble of self-deceit.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison


Civil Society

“Civil Society”—a complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churches—builds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust


Hugo on Genius

“Tear down theory, poetic systems... No more rules, no more models... Genius conjures up rather than learns... ” —Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois


Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State


Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings, and that a refusal to use the means appointed was a damning sin.”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990


Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh


Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy


Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006


China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing


Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Conservatism

Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


mysql close

 

©2012 Christopher Chantrill