The Children Of The Welfare State

AFTER CLOSE on a century, the radical social reforms of the welfare state are clearly bearing fruit. And we can begin to see a new social type emerging: the child of the welfare state.

I raise this because of the conviction in England last week of Ian Huntley, accused of killing two ten-year-old schoolgirls in 2002 in the little village of Soham near Cambridge, England. Huntley had worked as the janitor at the school the little girls attended. According to British prison psychiatrist Theodore Dalrymple, Huntley is a “perfectly normal young British male… of a certain social stratum.”

His two murders mark him out as unusual, but his inflamed egotism, his need to dominate young girls, his previous experience with underage girls mark him as typical of that certain type in today’s England. For the religion of positive self-esteem rages, if anything, much stronger in Britain than in the United States.

The reverse of the Huntley coin is his girl-friend, Maxine Carr, who lived a life of abject submission to Huntley combined with “utter drunken sluttishness” when out of his clutches. You could read a book about the Ian Huntleys and Maxine Carrs of Britain in Dalrymple’s Life at the Bottom, now available in paperback.

Huntley and Carr are poster children of the welfare state.

In the United States, of course, we do not experience the same social collapse. The violent crime rate in London, for instance, is four times the rate in Harlem. But we have our violent underclass, our special children of the welfare state. Then there are the sorry victims of the hookup culture in our colleges. As four twenty-year-old co-eds reported on the Dennis Prager radio show recently, nobody dates anymore. They hookup at drunken parties, exchanging physical intimacies before they even get to know each other; only after physical intimacy may they decide to begin a relationship. We are raising a whole generation of young women who have never been courted. And they hate it.

In The New York Times Magazine on December 14, 2003, we were treated to a feature on the Dean kids, the young people that have flocked to volunteer for Howard Dean’s presidential campaign. It is a story of aimless anomie and a yearning for friendship transformed by sudden conversion and enthusiastic commitment.

Then there is the naïve presumption of Rachel Corrie, the 23 year-old pacifist who was killed in the Gaza Strip when she interposed her body between an Israeli bulldozer and a Palestinian house on the border with Egypt. Corrie had been educated at Washington State’s Evergreen State College, a government-owned left-wing seminary, and was called to a life of activism. She participated in the 1999 Seattle riots, joined a pro-Palestinian peace group, and traveled to the Gaza strip to frame indictments against the Israelis in behalf of the victimized Palestinian people.

Is this what the progressive vision has come to: a deracinated generation of youth aimlessly clubbing, pubbing, and rutting? It surely wasn’t included in the prospectus of 1900. Only the martyred Rachel Corrie conforms to the progressive vision of the future, yet she is perhaps the most pathetic: a naïve girl enticed into cannon fodder for an ancient feud of which she understood nothing beyond trite propaganda.

When the progressives urged a welfare state upon us a century ago, they certainly did not expect to produce a generation of inflamed egotists or binge drinkers. They expected to produce creative and self-directed generation that would soar above the dull conformists of the nineteenth century. Obviously, something went wrong. The troubling thing is that the progressives don’t seem to have even begun a serious review of their achievements, but instead are defending their faith and their sinecures with pugnacious obstructionism.

Whether or not the welfare state works, we can at least agree that its achievements are modest enough to utterly vacate the presumption that its enormous appetite for compulsion and control should be continued. If the children of the welfare state are no worse than their grandparents, they are certainly no better.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com. His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

TAGS

Civil Society

“Civil Society”—a complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churches—builds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust

What Liberals Think About Conservatives

[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican

Liberal Coercion

[T]he Liberal, and still more the subspecies Radical... more than any other in these latter days seems under the impression that so long as he has a good end in view he is warranted in exercising over men all the coercion he is able[.]
Herbert Spencer, The Man Versus the State

Moral Imperatives of Modern Culture

These emerge out of long-standing moral notions of freedom, benevolence, and the affirmation of ordinary life... I have been sketching a schematic map... [of] the moral sources [of these notions]... the original theistic grounding for these standards... a naturalism of disengaged reason, which in our day takes scientistic forms, and a third family of views which finds its sources in Romantic expressivism, or in one of the modernist successor visions.
Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self

US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism

Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008

Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006

Never Trust Experts

No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome: if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent: if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe. They all require their strong wine diluted by a very large admixture of insipid common sense.
Lord Salisbury, “Letter to Lord Lytton”

Conservatism's Holy Grail

What distinguishes true Conservatism from the rest, and from the Blair project, is the belief in more personal freedom and more market freedom, along with less state intervention... The true Third Way is the Holy Grail of Tory politics today - compassion and community without compulsion.
Minette Marrin, The Daily Telegraph

Class War

In England there were always two sharply opposed middle classes, the academic middle class and the commercial middle class. In the nineteenth century, the academic middle class won the battle for power and status... Then came the triumph of Margaret Thatcher... The academics lost their power and prestige and... have been gloomy ever since.
Freeman Dyson, “The Scientist as Rebel”

Government Expenditure

The Union publishes an exact return of the amount of its taxes; I can get copies of the budgets of the four and twenty component states; but who can tell me what the citizens spend in the administration of county and township?
Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

Conservatism

Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity

mysql close