TOP NAV
BOOK
BLOGS 12
BLOGS 11
BLOGS 10
BLOGS 09
BLOGS 08
BLOGS 07
BLOGS 06
BLOGS 05
BLOGS 04
| Biography | Conservatives and the Creative Impulse: Part I |
by Christopher Chantrill
March 10, 2005 at 2:34 am
EVERYBODY now knows that President Larry Summers of Harvard, leader of an institution devoted both to truth and phonics (VE-RI-TAS), is in serious trouble for pursuing truth. It is a situation beyond parody. But inquiring minds are bound to wonder what is really behind all the sound and fury. Suppose the attack on Summers were not just a power play by leading women in science? It could have deep philosophical significance.
As sophisticated American Thinkers we should not eliminate the most likely possibility: mindless liberal wreckers at work. Liberals have already wrecked K-12 education, and they have wrecked the little platoons of civil society with their welfare state. They wrecked the working class, turning it into the underclass. They are doing their darndest to wreck the nuclear “heteronormative” family. Why not wreck the university, too?
But why should liberal women want to wreck Harvard over the issue of jobs for women in science? As usual, Jane Austen has the answer. Her heroines Fanny Price (of Mansfield Park) and Anne Elliott (of Persuasion) can tell us what is going down at Harvard.
Reviled and ignored by their snobbish families, Jane Austen’s two “good-girl” heroines seem to be superfluous; they are women of no consequence. In Fanny Price and Anne Elliott, according to C.S. Lewis, the “consciousness of mattering which is necessary even to the humblest woman is denied.” Men, we know, are expendable, but women, even the humblest, are important: they matter. Fortunately, the compassionate Jane Austen rescues her heroines from the denial of mattering in a traditional novelistic dénouement. Perhaps the distinguished scientific women of Harvard are telling us that they are afraid they don’t matter.
A century ago, science was simple. Ten thousand eager young male German physicists (ok, twenty) were pondering over the problem of the speed of light. No doubt every one of them was brilliant and deserving. But one day one of them solved the problem, and the rest are forgotten. Nobody cares. Why should they? But imagine now ten thousand female American scientists at this very moment working in university research laboratories all across America to solve spinal injuries using embryonic stem cells. If some man solves the enigma tomorrow and becomes the toast of Democrats everywhere, what will happen to all those worthy female scientists? Will they be reduced to doing research on adult stem cells? Should they go back to nursing? Might they become homemakers? They cannot just be ignored. They are women. They matter, as Larry Summers now agrees.
Women matter for a simple reason. We need them to make children. Historically, men have been peripheral to this activity, as biogenetic researchers recently discovered. Down the ages, only about half of the men in each generation have succeeded in inserting their genes into the next generation, whereas almost all women have succeeded in this endeavor. In compensation, men have focused their interest on less important activities, like making war and making science. The recent entry of women into historically less important activities like science is therefore important. It implies that the generation problem has at last been solved. What matters now is not the generation of children, but the generation of science.
Now that science has become necessary the men that once dominated the academy are deserting it for less important activities. Whereas a century ago the vast majority of college graduates were men, today only about 40 percent of each graduating cohort is male and even that proportion is expected to decline.
In fact, males seem to be going off education altogether. They are becoming so inattentive that up to 17 percent of boys ( go ahead, pick your favorite number) are now being drugged in the government’s public schools in order to keep their “bums on seats,” as the British say, and their minds focused “on task.”
We know why boys are going off education. They have less important things to do. They are engrossed in the current Big Thing: video games. All across America, at this very minute, millions of teenage boys have their bums on seats in front of their Xboxes playing the first person shooter game Halo 2. It’s an international phenomenon, of course. One all-American boy recently discovered that the Halo shooters around him were all speaking German.
On weekends, American kids are getting their fathers to take them into the office so they can play Halo 2 using big screen conference room monitors.
There are those that worry about this race to unimportance. They worry that the generation problem has not been solved, for modern women have shown such distaste for generation that population decline is now inevitable, at least in Old Europe.
But however hard they try, women will never be as unimportant as men. Whether they like it or not, women matter. Even women of science.
Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com. His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.
Civil Societya complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churchesbuilds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust
[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists, she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican
[T]he Liberal, and still more the subspecies Radical... more than any other in these latter days seems under the impression that so long as he has a good end in view he is warranted in exercising over men all the coercion he is able[.]
Herbert Spencer, The Man Versus the State
These emerge out of long-standing moral notions of freedom, benevolence, and the affirmation of ordinary life... I have been sketching a schematic map... [of] the moral sources [of these notions]... the original theistic grounding for these standards... a naturalism of disengaged reason, which in our day takes scientistic forms, and a third family of views which finds its sources in Romantic expressivism, or in one of the modernist successor visions.
Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self
Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism
For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008
As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable...
[1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006
No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome: if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent: if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe. They all require their strong wine diluted by a very large admixture of insipid common sense.
Lord Salisbury, Letter to Lord Lytton
What distinguishes true Conservatism from the rest, and from the Blair project, is the belief in more personal freedom and more market freedom, along with less state intervention... The true Third Way is the Holy Grail of Tory politics today - compassion and community without compulsion.
Minette Marrin, The Daily Telegraph
In England there were always two sharply opposed middle classes, the academic middle class and the commercial middle class. In the nineteenth century, the academic middle class won the battle for power and status... Then came the triumph of Margaret Thatcher... The academics lost their power and prestige and... have been gloomy ever since.
Freeman Dyson, The Scientist as Rebel
The Union publishes an exact return of the amount of its taxes; I can get copies of the budgets of the four and twenty component states; but who can tell me what the citizens spend in the administration of county and township?
Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America
Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says we should....
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity
mysql close
©2007 Christopher Chantrill