|China and Christianity||Don't Repeal the 22nd Amendment|
by Christopher Chantrill
February 26, 2006 at 2:08 am
LOOK AT WAL-MART. It has revolutionized retailing with relentless cost reduction and process improvement. It helps keep the United States at No. 1 in wealth and productivity. When it opens a store in ordinary America, about 4,000 people usually apply for the 400 jobs.
But when Wal-Mart opens a store in underprivileged America, then the jobseekers tear the place down. In Oakland, California, 11,000 people applied for jobs at a new Wal-Mart store. But that was on the weeny Left Coast. When Wal-Mart applied to build a store in Chicago, in the underprivileged South Side of The City That Works, the citys Democrat council said no thanks, we dont need your stinkn store and its jobs. So Wal-Mart built a store right across the Chicago city line in Evergreen Park. A total of 25,000 people applied for the 325 positions at the new store.
And everybodys happy, right?
No, liberals and Democrats are not happy.
You see, liberals think it an outrage that there are people out there with basic human needs unmet. For instance, they believe that if someone, a Wal-Mart employee, for instance, cannot afford health insurance then you should pay for it. Because health care is a basic human right.
They certainly have a point. If someone is in need, then we have a moral duty to help them. The question is, when does a moral duty become a legal duty? At what point do we start legislating morality? Well, for one thing, when we pass a law that says that if a large corporation, e.g. Wal-Mart, doesnt spend 8 percent of payroll on health care for its employees, it should pay the government the difference. That is what they just did in the great state of Maryland.
It is, of course, a fine and moral thing to pass a law to force other people to spend their money to for a great moral purpose like increasing access to health care. It feels so good, we should do it more often. But for Wal-Mart, things are not so easy.
Wal-Mart believes in Always Low Prices for its customers. It does not actually believe that Always Low Prices for its customers is a moral issue, or a human right, but pretty close to it. The problem is that Wal-Mart is not willing to sacrifice its Always Low Prices on the altar of First Dollar Health Insurance. It offers a range of health insurance options to its employees, but nothing close to the First Dollar Health Insurance offered by many of its unionized competitors. For Democrats, who worship at the shrine of First Dollar Health Insurance, Wal-Marts measly health insurance offering is a blasphemy.
We all know where that can get you these days.
But the Democrats problem with Wal-Mart is not just religious. It is also practical. Many of Wal-Marts entry-level employees are eligible for Medicaid and other government health benefits. Not surprisingly, these workers choose to continue their government health benefits instead of actually paying for their health insurance through Wal-Mart. That is why Democrats passed a law in Maryland to force companies with over 5,000 employees that do not spend 8 percent of payroll on health insurance to cough up the difference to the state government. They wanted Wal-Mart to pick up the tab.
The Maryland law is just for starters. Here in Washington State, Democrats are pushing a law that requires large employers to pay at least 9 percent of payroll on health insurance or pay up. Eight percent, nine percent. Pretty soon we are talking about tithing.
Of course, Wal-Mart has not been taking this lying down. After all, Wal-Mart did not get to be the global best practice retailer and Americas Economic Secret Weapon for nothing. It is not going to sit around dithering while some State Senator Lex Luthor tosses a bag of kryptonite over the fence into its cost structure. So Wal-Mart, as reported by The New York Times reporter Michael Barbaro, has started opening health clinics in its stores and is offering a health insurance Value Plan with a cost of $11 per month for an individual that allows for three generic prescriptions and three doctor visits before a [$1,000] deductible kicks in.
Meanwhile in Sterling, Illinois, according to the Wall Street Journal, Wal-Mart is opening an 880,000 sq ft distribution center. In Sterling a mere 6,000 people applied for Wal-Marts 675 jobs. When Susan Adami was offered a Wal-Mart job at $13 per hour she
had to catch herself... Heck, thats more than Ive made working 29 years, she says. Her last job paid $11 per hour, the most she ever earned working in a factory.
At least Susan Adami is happy with Wal-Mart.
Buy his Road to the Middle Class.
When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of agesthey seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings, and that a refusal to use the means appointed was a damning sin.
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990
In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society
We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.
E. G. West, Education and the State
Law being too tenuous to rely upon in [Ulster and the Scottish borderlands], people developed patterns of settling differences by personal fighting and family feuds.
Thomas Sowell, Conquests and Cultures
The primary thing to keep in mind about German and Russian thought since
1800 is that it takes for granted that the Cartesian, Lockean or Humean scientific and
philosophical conception of man and nature... has been shown by indisputable evidence to be
F.S.C. Northrop, The Meeting of East and West
Inquiry does not start unless there is a problem... It is the problem and its
characteristics revealed by analysis which guides one first to the relevant facts and then,
once the relevant facts are known, to the relevant hypotheses.
F.S.C. Northrop, The Logic of the Sciences and the Humanities
But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie
that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison
I mean three systems in one: a predominantly market economy; a polity respectful of the rights of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and a system of cultural institutions moved by ideals of liberty and justice for all.
In short, three dynamic and converging systems functioning as one: a democratic polity, an economy based on markets and incentives, and a moral-cultural system which is plural and, in the largest sense, liberal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism
The incentive that impels a man to act is always some uneasiness...
But to make a man act [he must have]
the expectation that purposeful behavior has the power to remove
or at least to alleviate the felt uneasiness.
Ludwig von Mises, Human Action
[In the] higher Christian churches... they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm
When we received Christ, Phil added, all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh
The recognition and integration of extralegal property rights [in the Homestead Act] was a key element in the United States becoming the most important market economy and producer of capital in the world.
Hernando de Soto, The Mystery of Capital